WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

967

(post is archived)

[–] 8 pts

They'll close 6 months later with some gov-speak message. "We were unable to maintain a consistent stock of products consumers desired, and as a result they chose to continue shopping at larger chain ventures."

Translation: Niggers stole everything so even the people that did want to buy things couldn't because niggers stole it all.

[–] 4 pts

Democrats believe that niggers steal because they are hungry. And that they deserve reparations anyway. They'll keep the stores open until the city runs out of money.

[–] 1 pt

This will happen.. But only after about 3-4 murders at these facilities. They will also have some blurb about being unable to guarantee the safety of the employees.

[–] 1 pt

I can see all of that happening.

[–] 3 pts

It all makes sense now. They are trying to make things so bad for private business that they leave, so they can set up commie replacements.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

They will be staffed and managed by politicians relatives. No one will know where all the money goes, and will resemble stores from the soviet union and cuba.

[–] 3 pts

White taxpayer funded grocery stores in nigger land? It's so the niggers can steal indefinitely. There's no corporate boards to answer to. The books never need to be balanced, White male tax money will flow indefinitely. Theft will never stop. Once these stores are opened and the looting begins, the only way to shut them down would be a politician admitting the stores aren't profitable due to niggers inclination to commit theft. Political suicide. They need those votes to stay in power. Welcome to a brand new way to take money from White men and give it to niggers. They didn't have enough in the first place.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Isn’t that what food stamps and WIC stores are anyways?

[–] 1 pt

Except now, the government will contract out the actual implementation to well connected "partners". Yet another money laundering operation.

[–] 2 pts

Welcome to Stalingrad.

[–] 2 pts

Of course, looting these won't be permitted as they're "necessary for the community".

[–] 1 pt

What's the point in owning anything in chimpcongo? Everything gets stolen or destroyed.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Prediction: they will have police at these stores who are actually allowed to stop looting, and it will turn into a government bread line with 12 crappy products loaded with chemical preservatives. The law enforcement will be funded by a different budget, giving them an unfair competitive advantage. This will drive small businesses out, which is what they want. It will be incredibly cost ineffective, the income will be stolen by political cronies, the law enforcement requirements will be used to justify larger police budgets, and the expense will ultimately be passed on to Aryan taxpayers.

[–] 1 pt

Most government programs are essentially taxpayer money laundering operations for well connected people. The products in the store will be from WEF "partners". This will pave the way for our new laboratory engineered "foods." You know, fake meat, fake vegetables, bugs and what not.

[–] 1 pt

Socialism. Incremental socialism. And like all other socialism before it the mid-wit politicians will not be able to manage it. Even if they make stealing from exempt those from the general lawlessness, even if they make stealing from those stores a capital crime and enforce that law, the sheer incompetence of socialist adherents will destroy them.

[–] 1 pt

This is illegal competition. Cable companies already won that battle in court. That is why we have expensive nigger tier internet. Cities are not allowed to run their own ISPs.

[–] 0 pt

I don't understand the the concept of illegal except as it relates to us deplorables. Practically everything is illegal for us, while nothing is illegal... well, the word is meaningless as it relates to the kleptocracy/criminals.

Put another way, just because something is supposed to be illegal has no ramifications. In fact, for us, in spite of doing things legally, we will be prosecuted as if we did something illegal.

[–] 1 pt

That holds true until you start fighting back. Eventually you expose the double standards too much and it undermines their authority. There needs to be a perception of fairness in the courts by a majority of people. Otherwise people start becoming ungovernable.

[–] 0 pt

That is only partially true in some states. There are plenty of municipal owned ISP's in the us.