Can't speak for who the owners are but another possible explanation is that certain groups figured out a way to strong-arm the owners into compliance. You know, especially at a time when "dangerous speech" and "incitement" is suddenly at the forefront of everything, where DC imposed martial law on the basis of zip ties and funny hats.
Can't speak for who the owners are but another possible explanation is that certain groups figured out a way to strong-arm the owners into compliance. You know, especially at a time when "dangerous speech" and "incitement" is suddenly at the forefront of everything, where DC imposed martial law on the basis of zip ties and funny hats.
Could be the same thing that happened to Voat.
Could be the same thing that happened to Voat.
(post is archived)