Is archive.is not good to use? I find it hard to keep up with all this. It is what I've always used.
Is archive.is not good to use? I find it hard to keep up with all this. It is what I've always used.
It's fine. The ".is" one is constantly DNS poisoned, even where the others work (which makes me go hmm?). It's harder for me to use. Your original link had a tracking element. I archived so I could read it and I dropped the tracker.
AFAIK, you're fine.
It's fine. The ".is" one is constantly DNS poisoned, even where the others work (which makes me go hmm?). It's harder for me to use. Your original link had a tracking element. I archived so I could read it and I dropped the tracker.
AFAIK, you're fine.
If I were you I'd edit the post to use Noisy's link. not that i know much about this kind of thing but it's cool you all do. i never realized they were tracking our web traffic like that and you could dodge it by using an archive. learned that a bit ago. cool stuff
If I were you I'd edit the post to use Noisy's link. not that i know much about this kind of thing but it's cool you all do. i never realized they were tracking our web traffic like that and you could dodge it by using an archive. learned that a bit ago. cool stuff
(post is archived)