In that hearing the govt claimed they interpreted the prerequisites of the act differently than everyone else, and therefore they were justified in invoking it. The judge (who was a long time family friend of trudeau) essentially said that was good enough reason for him.
In that hearing the govt claimed they interpreted the prerequisites of the act differently than everyone else, and therefore they were justified in invoking it. The judge (who was a long time family friend of trudeau) essentially said that was good enough reason for him.
Yea - sounds like more willful deception and duplicity.
Yea - sounds like more willful deception and duplicity.
(post is archived)