WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

539

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

What? First of all, GREAT WORK Canadian Civil Liberties who kept the fight. Second, it is REQUIRED that after using emergencies act, need to have a hearing. That hearing was surprisingly against what Trudeau did. And the judge, EVEN AFTER SAYING THAT TRUDEAU HAD NO REASON TO USE EMERGENCIES ACT, HE WAS NOT GUILTY OF WRONGDOING.

Yeah, if you think that he's not going to have any justice served, you're right. There is Chinese interference in parliament, he fired the investigation team, and since no evidence was submitted, was cleared. There is plenty of tyranny in Canada, it's worse than you think.

[–] 3 pts

In that hearing the govt claimed they interpreted the prerequisites of the act differently than everyone else, and therefore they were justified in invoking it. The judge (who was a long time family friend of trudeau) essentially said that was good enough reason for him.

[–] 0 pt

Yea - sounds like more willful deception and duplicity.