I tell you what, between our retards and all the drug trafficking shitskins, if I had to eliminate one group over the other, it would be the shitskins
Simple as!
And I don't give a shit about the impact on "the economy"
Now it goes without saying that if I had to choose between my handicapped cousin and you, if I had to decide which one of you has to die to save the other... Well, I would do exactly what you would do
I would keep my cousin, because she has more value to me
Simple as...
>I think even most children understand that taking something away and then putting it back is not a gain
I don't think like a child...
I don't think like a child...
Using the argument that it’s beneficial to pay welfare to reinject it into the economy disagrees
I tell you what, between our retards and all the drug trafficking shitskins, if I had to eliminate one group over the other, it would be the shitskins
It’s also childish to look at a list of 100 problems and say “Number 59 isn’t a problem because there are 58 worse problems!”
I would keep my cousin, because she has more value to me
Yes, making political and financial decisions based on emotion and personal desire rather than long term stability for the community has been the downfall of pretty much every powerful civilization in history. I hope it makes you happy to be among them
Using the argument that it’s useful to pay welfare to reinject it into economy disagrees
Why do you think they do it? Charity? Nah, it's book trick, it's artificial stimulation of the economy, artificial spending, velocity of money, but shhhhh it's a secret...
It’s also childish to look at a list of 100 problems and say “Number 59 isn’t a problem because there are 58 worse problems!”
Sorry to break it to you but life is a matter of priority
Yes, making political and financial decisions based on emotion rather than long term stability has been the downfall of pretty much every powerful civilization in history. I hope it makes you happy to be among them
If I have a superior net worth to one of your relatives, and you have to choose between me and the said relative, you would choose to spare my life and let your relative die, because I have a superior net worth????
That's what you are saying?
Are you insane?
Why do you think they do it? Charity? Nah, it's book trick, it's artificial stimulation of the economy, artificial spending, velocity of money, but shhhhh it's a secret...
We both know why they give whites’ money to niggers, and it’s not anything you listed
Sorry to break it to you but life is a matter of priority
Should someone who needs vehicle repairs neglect the cheaper ones because they also need more expensive ones? If your transmission rattles when it shifts, do you refuse to replace your brake pads?
If I have a superior net worth to one of your relatives, and you have to choose between me and the said relative, you would choose to spare my life and let your relative die, because I have a superior net worth????
That's what you are saying?
Not even close.
Having a lower net worth than someone else is not the same as having a negative value to society.
If someone produces $1 more than they cost, society can support an unlimited amount of those people. If someone costs $1 more than they produce, society can not support an unlimited amount of those people.
The concept isn’t difficult.
(post is archived)