>Now why stop at retards? How about elderlies, boomers instance? Anyone draining from society does not deserve to be part of that society. If someone built a retirement plan and is living off of it, or if they built a family that is taking care of them, that’s not a drain. If someone never planned for the future and is receiving Medicare and welfare, they should go. >I mean look at the pile of debt and it's happened under their watch after all, it far out weight their contribution to society and they largely profited from that debt, and still do You’re conflating policy created by corrupt politicians and the contributions of common people. Corrupt politicians should be hanged in public, but a boomer who spent his life building houses and raising a family and supporting other boomers by spending earned money instead of receiving handouts definitely did contribute to society >If I could make all the people I don't like disappear by just snapping my fingers, all the people I see everyday, that I don't like because I deem them a burden for a reason or another... I can guarantee you there wouldn't be much people left... Being measurably a financial burden on your community is not the same as not liking someone. But in any case, I agree that society would be a lot better off if there were far fewer people and the people who remained were generally productive and well-liked, don’t you?