Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

I don't know how accurate this is, but this woman is claiming that canada is offering the physically sick, the mentally ill, children and poor people the chance to euthanise themselves in a state-funded campaign. if this is true and it wouldn't surprise me if it was (i hate to say), then this is indeed a worrying turn of events. is the canadian government just 'trying to do the right thing' but failing miserably on optics? or is it showing its true colours as a psychopathic machine hellbent on dispensing with its 'unclean' citizens?

I don't know how accurate this is, but this woman is claiming that canada is offering the physically sick, the mentally ill, children and poor people the chance to euthanise themselves in a state-funded campaign. if this is true and it wouldn't surprise me if it was (i hate to say), then this is indeed a worrying turn of events. is the canadian government just 'trying to do the right thing' but failing miserably on optics? or is it showing its true colours as a psychopathic machine hellbent on dispensing with its 'unclean' citizens?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (10).
[–] • 1 pt

What's the argument against elective euthanasia?

[–] • 3 pts

Normally, society protects itself by enforcing laws that killing people, including yourself, is not allowed. See

Fast forward to today, world governments are now killing its denizens itself in cooperation with corporations.

[–] • 1 pt

does society benefit from extending the lifespan of someone who wants to kill themselves?

[–] • 2 pts

Many people believe society has lots of "useless eaters". You then need to ask who decides who these people are? For people who want to kill themselves, they have an illness. Society typically helps ill people to recover. Same with criminals. We attempt to punish people for crime and hope they learn to go back to society and become part of it. Some do and some don't. Capital punishment assumes a convicted criminal cannot go back into society.

Allowing people to euthanize themselves does not give people a chance to recover from an illness they may have. Again, who decides?

We don't allow criminals to decide their fate, a judge and jury typically does this. I don't think individuals should have the power to kill themselves.

Having said this, it's pretty clear society is at war with the globalists. They want us to die. In a sense, the method they are using is suicide. They give us the chance to kill ourselves by clot shot. Those that take the shot will die of VAIDs. So, people are being encouraged to kill themselves.

[–] • 2 pts

No. We also don't benefit of artificially extending lives of those that would have died without modernity.

[–] • 1 pt

Only if that desire is temporary. Otherwise, someone who wants to die has no reasons not to create a dangerous situation, in hopes of dying. What care or consideration would this person show to potential collateral damage, given that all of society would be responsible for their continued pain?

[–] • 1 pt

It undermines the states/church claim to own us as chattel.