Fun fact: most trains are already electric.

The problem may be the energy comes from diesel generators on board. We already know .

electric engine

towing multiple thousand tons

I mean.

I say, BAN EVERYTHING, cars, trains, electricity

no ? why not ? why is polluting to produce solar panels good and polluting to produce electricity bad ?

hey, the above is a rhetorical question

Funny how they aren't going after airplanes, which emit nearly 4 times as much as trains. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P10153PC.pdf

Banning the literal most efficient form of transportation, where a 2 mile long train has less contact surface area than a single car tire, with every rail car drafting behind the next. I knew CA was retarded but not THIS retarded, fucking niggers.

Right now there is No replacement for Diesel Power. Trucks, trains, planes and jets (yes jet fuel is just high grade diesel) all require it and ANYONE claiming otherwise is either a moron or a 'climate change' Criminal. Ask them what will 'charge' an electric truck or train?

Now they are saying that by 2036 there can be no diesel trucks either. Bear in mind that none of this is by action of the state's legislature. These edicts are passed down through 'rulemaking' by an air quality 'regulatory body' and then the EPA approves the "regulation" at the federal level. Nobody voted for this. This is definitely not the way our government is supposed to work.

This is going to get overturned surely. Interstate commerce is federal; states can't regulate it