You forgot an important point. He was under investigation by the DoJ for insider trading and monopoly.
Was not aware of that. Your second point ties in with what I said in #3, "lacking evidence" was partly me lacking / knowing about evidence of such illicit happenings.
>You forgot an important point. He was under investigation by the DoJ for insider trading and monopoly.
Was not aware of that. Your second point ties in with what I said in #3, "lacking evidence" was partly me lacking / knowing about evidence of such illicit happenings.
Your second point ties in with what I said in #3,
No, it doesn’t. It’s the opposite.
> Your second point ties in with what I said in #3,
No, it doesn’t. It’s the opposite.