WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

724

The incident is not about (((flock))). The incident speaks of something orders of magnitude more depressing and harmful.

The incident is not about (((flock))). The incident speaks of something orders of magnitude more depressing and harmful.
[–] 2 pts

There's no expectation of privacy in public. Time to train cameras on the (((Flock))) company C-levels and catch them doing shit. Oh wait, you can't film corporate buildings because (((reasons))). They need to be watched through a different kind of optics system, at a distance, for [[[reasons]]].

[–] 1 pt (edited )

There is always an expectation of privacy from the government. Ubiquitous tracking at all moments outside of private property is unassailably contrary to the US dogma. Any claim about "no expectation of privacy" (in public) is extremely short-sighted and wanton for slavery.

Police, politicians, bureaucrats, et al. need to; once again, fear for their lives with every decision they make, every word they speak. They don't, none of them do, and that's a relatively modern--w/ respect to the US--and imperceptibly small w/ respect to human history--state of governance.