It's legal because he's essentially leasing a software based project with some hardware that he sort of owns but can't run without that software lease being in place. They didn't revoke access to the hardware he owns, they revoked access to use the software he is renting from Tesla. Which is "legal" even though it's shady as fuck and obviously not what the law intended by allowing software licenses to be revoked in that way.
Not really.
You'll find that he signed a contract stating they have a right to do this. This is standard contracteze for those who buy from those no credit lots. They put equipment (immobilizer with GPS) into the vehicle to do exactly this until the vehicle is paid off. If they miss a payment the vehicle is turned off. Take too long to catch up and they pick it up.
But without the contractual clause they can't legally disable a vehicle until it has been lawful repossessed. Thus the contractual requirement.
(post is archived)