WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

195

They can literally draw upon the experience of fully vaccinated nations like Singapore and Israel and Iceland and their scientific data sets showing they are not getting any reductions in hospitalisations and infection rates.

It's like they are in a rush to commit the same mistakes or are expecting a different result. There's no reason we'll achieve a different result.

They can literally draw upon the experience of fully vaccinated nations like Singapore and Israel and Iceland and their scientific data sets showing they are not getting any reductions in hospitalisations and infection rates. It's like they are in a rush to commit the same mistakes or are expecting a different result. There's no reason we'll achieve a different result.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Considering you use the word "epidemiology" to describe all this - tells me that you really don't know what you're talking about. The correct word you're looking for is "virology".

There is no evidence whatsoever to state that initial viral loads influence outcomes.

[–] 0 pt

Right. How much viral inoculum you receive as a predictor whether develop enough of a viral load to be symptomatic and infectious has nothing to do with epidemiology! Obviously. There’s just no intersection here. What was I thinking.

There is no evidence whatsoever to state that initial viral loads influence outcomes

There’s a ton. Apparently you are too much of a nigger to use a search engine. Not my problem.

[–] 0 pt

Once again, because it seems you're too thick to understand - you are the one making claims thus the onus is on you to provide me with evidence to support your claims - and not for me to go searching for it. Stop projecting your niggertry on me.

[–] 0 pt

The onus is not on me to do all your research for you and feed it to you like pap to a baby. Did you search the phrase I gave to you? No of course you didn’t. You are that lazy. Stop bitching and search it.