I'm still extremely dubious about taking any jab from a virus that is upwards of 98.5% survivable and won't protect you against other strains.
[Atleast Astra-Zeneca is not that potential trojan horse found in Pfizer and Moderna mRNA style vaccines.](https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/health/oxford-astrazeneca-covid-19-vaccine.html)
* [Oxford AstraZeneca Covid vaccine: everything we know so far ](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/23/oxford-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-everything-we-know-so-far)
I'm still extremely dubious about taking any jab from a virus that is upwards of 98.5% survivable and won't protect you against other strains.
[Also, that previous SARS immunization strategy has previously made people more susceptible to future strains of the virus, with coronavirus being a SARS/MERS infection.](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/01/new-coronavirus-variants-could-cause-more-reinfections-require-updated-vaccines)
>in Britain and Brazil found the vaccine to be 70.4% protective.
Virus is 99% recoverable in people 1 to 74 years old. Should be illegal to take if you're in that age group.
>>in Britain and Brazil found the vaccine to be 70.4% protective.
Virus is 99% recoverable in people 1 to 74 years old. Should be illegal to take if you're in that age group.
(post is archived)