You would wear that without a law for enforcement. If not, you would suffer the consequences. But you like the control aspect.
Masks do nothing. It's an airborne virus. It's all theater. It's about control. This is a classic case of a "good reason" vs. the "real reason."
You would wear that without a law for enforcement. If not, you would suffer the consequences. But you like the control aspect.
Exactly same thing.
Masks do nothing. It's an airborne virus. It's all theater. It's about control. This is a classic case of a "good reason" vs. the "real reason."
It's actually moisture. Small particles of moisture from your mouth, hence why you should cover your mouth.
There's evidence that suggests it doesn't do much. (acpjournals.org)
Nice source, bud:
Study in Danish.
Randomized
It is uncertain if this observed association arises through protection of uninfected wearers (protective effect), via reduced transmission from infected mask wearers (source control), or both.
Results came from Surveys LOL.
gj
(post is archived)