> You believe there is no creator? Instead of being the 52nd snarky shitposter running on feeling and knee-jerk pre-programed response, why don't you be the first to assert your claim as fact supported by verifiable evidence? > You believe nothing blew up into something, giant rocks float in space, life just arose somehow, and 'evolved'? No one has [hypothesised ](https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/assets/Image/saw0618Inno08_d.png)something came from nothing except religion. It may be incorrect, but it offers a more plausible explanation than a divine creator willing existence into being in a week. > giant rocks float in space, Ever heard of asteroids? > life just arose somehow, and 'evolved'? Single celled organisms such as bacteria were the very first organisms to live on Earth approximately 3.5 billion years ago. Mutli-celluilar organism have only been around for about 600million years. [SA](https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-did-life-begin1/) > *"In the 1950s the iconic Miller-Urey experiment, which zapped a mixture of water and simple chemicals with electric pulses (to simulate the impact of lightning), demonstrated that amino acids, the building blocks of proteins, are easy to make. Other molecules of life turned out to be harder to synthesize, however, and it is now apparent that we need to completely reimagine the path from chemistry to life. The central reason hinges on the versatility of RNA, a very long molecule that plays a multitude of essential roles in all existing forms of life."*