Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

Christians believe in angels. Muslims believe in a pegasus equivalency (Burāq). Mormons believe in Big Foot, Yeti and Sasquatch. Jehovah's Witness believe in giant space elves (Nephilim). Jews believe in anthropomorphised beings made from inanimate objects like clay (Golems).

Its Super-natural and completely rational.

Haha my sides.

Christians believe in angels. Muslims believe in a pegasus equivalency (Burāq). Mormons believe in Big Foot, Yeti and Sasquatch. Jehovah's Witness believe in giant space elves (Nephilim). Jews believe in anthropomorphised beings made from inanimate objects like clay (Golems). Its Super-**natural** and completely rational. Haha my sides.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (22).
[–] • 0 pt

The existence of law implies a Lawgiver.

Not necessarily. You’re just filling in a gap in understanding without evidence.

Purely random events also do not create matter.

Why not?

Therefore it logically follows that the universe itself must have a cause

No it doesn’t. You are applying biological reproduction theories to the birth of a universe. That’s comparing apples with universes.

[–] • 0 pt

You are misrepresenting the "god of the gaps" argument. According to RationalWiki: "God of the gaps (or a divine fallacy) is a logical fallacy that occurs when believers invoke Goddidit (or a variant) in order to account for some natural phenomena that science cannot (at the time of the argument) explain."

The argument here is not for a particular natural phenomena, but for why there is something rather than nothing and why that something operates under a series of very precise laws. Science can explain the "what" of natural phenomena, but cannot explain the "why", or that which pre-existed the entirety of the natural universe because the scientific method cannot apply to that which cannot be observed.