![Satellite pollution! [970x546 - 180KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/DJWkOr.jpg){kind=link}
No, your right!
But it give an estimate of how much light crap there is overhead. It also doesn't take into account the crap from ground base light sources like cities.
But it does give you an understanding of why Astronomers are so pissed with Elon's StarLink.
No, your right!
But it give an estimate of how much light crap there is overhead. It also doesn't take into account the crap from ground base light sources like cities.
But it does give you an understanding of why Astronomers are so pissed with Elon's StarLink.
But it give an estimate of how much light crap there is overhead.
Not without knowing the camera settings, exposure time and sensitivity to light of the sensor/film. There's not enough hard information here to determine any such thing as the light pollution. You can do this same thing with stars so does that mean we have too much light pollution from stars too?
>But it give an estimate of how much light crap there is overhead.
Not without knowing the camera settings, exposure time and sensitivity to light of the sensor/film. There's not enough hard information here to determine any such thing as the light pollution. You can do this same thing with stars so does that mean we have too much light pollution from stars too?
Well it's not the intensity but the number.
Edit: added the link
Well it's not the intensity but the number. [Light pollution!](https://www.iau.org/public/themes/light_pollution/)
Edit: added the link
So we have too many birds as well then.
So we have too many birds as well then.
(post is archived)