I can see it fully, unless it’s raining here or there, that is.
I can see it fully, unless it’s raining here or there, that is.
Any considerstions on what it would take to disprove refraction?
Any considerstions on what it would take to disprove refraction?
Refraction is observable and repeatable, unlike water curving around a ball. So how about you PROVE that water curves around a ball first?
Refraction is observable and repeatable, unlike water curving around a ball. So how about you PROVE that water curves around a ball first?
Sorry. I thought refraction was being denied. Because if light bent around the surface over the bulge then it was propaganda or whatever you said earlier
Sorry. I thought refraction was being denied. Because if light bent around the surface over the bulge then it was propaganda or whatever you said earlier
(post is archived)