Any considerstions on what it would take to disprove refraction?
Any considerstions on what it would take to disprove refraction?
Refraction is observable and repeatable, unlike water curving around a ball. So how about you PROVE that water curves around a ball first?
Refraction is observable and repeatable, unlike water curving around a ball. So how about you PROVE that water curves around a ball first?
Sorry. I thought refraction was being denied. Because if light bent around the surface over the bulge then it was propaganda or whatever you said earlier
Sorry. I thought refraction was being denied. Because if light bent around the surface over the bulge then it was propaganda or whatever you said earlier
(post is archived)