Are you are not understanding me or just pretending not to understand me?
Im not staking a claim that flights out of Argentina is not possible on a flat earth
Wow. Did you just type that?
Ok. I am going too fast for you.
So what Im saying is if you measure the durations of time out of Argentina to various airports then they are only possible on the spherical model.
I get what you are saying, it’s just very stupid! How do you know the durations don’t work on a flat earth model?
SHOW ME THE FLAT EARTH MODEL/S YOU USED.
This is the second time I’ve asked you to provide the model you based your conclusion on.
Or if you prefer, please answer whether you ‘proved’ it worked on a ball earth, is that the round ball earth or the pear one??
Also, gaslighting is lame.
which map do you want me to use? The one I used before had north pole in center and argentina at bottom and australia on top.
It wont take you long ro find a flat earth map has locations on it that take a longer time to travel to than cities that are further away. You can check united.com or kayak.com or whatever.
This line of questioning was more along the lines of there may not be an accurate flat earth map (yet). So ‘proving’ it doesn’t work on a map that may not be accurate, is flimsy proof.
It’s like, which one of these globes is the ‘real’ one?!
https://pic8.co/sh/EfPgsj.jpeg
If you enter faulty data into an algorithm, your result will also be faulty. That’s what I’m getting at here.
(post is archived)