Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

304

If you really think this could happen with an earth spinning and going around a sun that is also moving around a galaxy, well, you aren’t thinking, you are regurgitating what you have been told to think.

If you really think this could happen with an earth spinning and going around a sun that is also moving around a galaxy, well, you aren’t thinking, you are regurgitating what you have been told to think.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (217).
[–] • -1 pt

Let me break it down for YOU. There is NO curvature. There is NO ball earth, it’s a fairytale. Flight paths that ‘work’ ‘on the globe’ DO work on the flat earth.

I’m sorry that you are unable to comprehend how your stubborn refusal to entertain a thought which contradicts your conditioning makes you a retarded cuck imo

Here’s some more information and logic for you to ignore in stubborn defence of your belief:

https://pic8.co/a/f5f58dea-8abf-4731-aa03-a0f9a8344956

[–] • 0 pt

Thanks for the link.

This one actually bothers me

https://pic8.co/d/4540bf7b-d643-483b-8937-3d9ababb81c9.jpeg

Ive observed this a few times and even stopped to photograph the anomaly of the moon. Do you have an explanation of this? Even a flat planet (or a sun and moon closer to the planet) would not explain this shadow irregularity.

[–] • 0 pt

Thank you for engaging in useful discussion.

No I do not have a solid opinion on this phenomenon. I have followed numerous leads, including the theory that there are other objects in the sky that we are unaware of (search theories about Rahu and Ketu), and another theory that the moonlight shows it electro-magnetic ‘charge’.. you might find that one quite thought provoking, and so here’s a condensed infographic for that...

https://pic8.co/sh/83vTar.jpeg

There’s another theory that the sun is outside the dome so what we see is its refraction, but having also done a lot of scuba diving, I find that less likely. Haven’t ruled it out, but do not give much time to it. Except it did lead me to sundogs, which are also fascinating.

I do not claim to have all the answers. I am a truth seeker. I can also admit when I am wrong, but after testing and te-testing, I am sure that there is no curvature. Although I have considered the option that the actual circumference of the earth is way bigger than the accepted circumference, but I discarded this theory due to the inherent properties of water which causes it to be level when at rest. Like in a glass, bath, pool, lake and ocean.

Thank you.

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah nobody has been able to explain this to me. I can only imagine the answer is something about refracting light. Thanks for the leads of possible answers.

[–] • 0 pt

As I suspected. Flat earthers cant come to terms with the flights and are unwilling to conduct an experiment that would actually show them.

[–] • -1 pt (edited )

So you admit that your level of comprehension is too low for a real debate. I acknowledge your commitment to ignorance.

As I have mentioned, I have performed tests and experiments which are scientifically robust, while you have taken external, changing data and coated it with rank bullshit all the while trying to gaslight me.

All you have shown is your own insecurities and massive ego lol

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

You asked me what I did and I checked bookings. Flying out of buenos aires only checks out on a sphere. I also observed that you are not entertaining this experiment and you wish to change the subject. That makes you the one afraid to risk debate, insecure , and a commitment to ignorance.

I challenge you to map out any flight that goes around "the globe" on the spherical model then try to make sense out of the durations on the flat earth north pole model.

It is impossible unless you imagine pilots are slowing down and speeding up to makeup for the false path.