Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

230

If you really think this could happen with an earth spinning and going around a sun that is also moving around a galaxy, well, you aren’t thinking, you are regurgitating what you have been told to think.

If you really think this could happen with an earth spinning and going around a sun that is also moving around a galaxy, well, you aren’t thinking, you are regurgitating what you have been told to think.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (217).
[–] • 0 pt

Ok. You do understand that ''at sea level'' is the very location that is being contested, right?

An observing fly-on-the-wall would be the final authority on whether or not the elevation was measured from flat or bulbous ground.

If 2 individuals over a vast distance take a measurement and see they are both 20 meters above sea level elevation that does nothing to determine where they are in relation to eachother.

[–] • 0 pt

Nah, you are complicating a very simple test to avoid doing it yourself.

I found my own altitude, and the landmark I used is less than 4 metres above sea level, by all accounts and my own eyes. It’s a small, low island which should be completely hidden by the ocean, IF the earth were curved. But it’s not, because it’s not.

[–] • 0 pt

Lol. If you are wondering why results could show you are above sea level, with that instrument while you are - literally - standing - above - sea - level, then I don't know what to tell you

[–] • 0 pt

Ahhh, no? That’s not what I’m wondering at all! The fly on the wall thing confused me!