WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

I've been running into this on X when I speak out against foreign invasion and White displacement.

I usually go with a mix of:

1) We conquered it fair and square, the history of the world is full of populations at war and being displaced. Why should I sit back and allow it to happen to the civilization the White man has built here?

2) That was 300+ years ago, what happened in the past doesn't justify these actions in the present.

3) Native Americans were raping and killing each other long before we got here anyways.

I'm not wholly satisfied with this retort. Is there a better angle or argument?

I've been running into this on X when I speak out against foreign invasion and White displacement. I usually go with a mix of: 1) We conquered it fair and square, the history of the world is full of populations at war and being displaced. Why should I sit back and allow it to happen to the civilization the White man has built here? 2) That was 300+ years ago, what happened in the past doesn't justify these actions in the present. 3) Native Americans were raping and killing each other long before we got here anyways. I'm not wholly satisfied with this retort. Is there a better angle or argument?
[–] 2 pts 13d

Current immigrants aren't coming to America, they're coming to Whiteland. There's a big difference between the two. Immigrants aren't looking for open spaces and the chance to build settlements and create new possibilities for self-governance and personal liberty. They want the "whitepeoplebuiltthis" lifestyle without all the work it took to actually build it.

Would they come to America without Americans, or go to Australia without Australians, or to Sweden without Swedes? Of fucking course not. So the "coming to America" argument is bullshit. They are coming to Whiteland for "whitepeoplebuiltthis" life. Because "whitepeoplebuiltthis" the White People of Whiteland get to say who gets in.