Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

I've been running into this on X when I speak out against foreign invasion and White displacement.

I usually go with a mix of:

1) We conquered it fair and square, the history of the world is full of populations at war and being displaced. Why should I sit back and allow it to happen to the civilization the White man has built here?

2) That was 300+ years ago, what happened in the past doesn't justify these actions in the present.

3) Native Americans were raping and killing each other long before we got here anyways.

I'm not wholly satisfied with this retort. Is there a better angle or argument?

I've been running into this on X when I speak out against foreign invasion and White displacement. I usually go with a mix of: 1) We conquered it fair and square, the history of the world is full of populations at war and being displaced. Why should I sit back and allow it to happen to the civilization the White man has built here? 2) That was 300+ years ago, what happened in the past doesn't justify these actions in the present. 3) Native Americans were raping and killing each other long before we got here anyways. I'm not wholly satisfied with this retort. Is there a better angle or argument?
You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (38).
[–] • 2 pts 7d

People throughout history have overtaken lands. Romans took over England before the Saxons before the Danes.

The question of native is irrelevant. It’s a question of what culture we want to succeed us - do we want our culture to persist or do we want to be overtaken like the Babylonians or the Egyptians or the native Americans?

[–] • 2 pts 7d

It’s a question of what culture we want to succeed

Yes, this.