"I could understand why you might feel that way. It's only natural to despise your conquerors."
"I could understand why you might feel that way. It's only natural to despise your conquerors."
There is no argument. What difference does being native make?
The argument is about multiculturalism: importing niggers into white society destroys white societies. Some people want that, or at least believe they want it.
The argument is all societies need to be protected by borders. There is no case to be made for mixing different races or even different cultures. Each culture tries to protect itself by surrounding itself with others of its kind. Eventually, one culture will win.
There is no argument. What difference does being native make?
The argument is about multiculturalism: importing niggers into white society destroys white societies. Some people want that, or at least believe they want it.
The argument is all societies need to be protected by borders. There is no case to be made for mixing different races or even different cultures. Each culture tries to protect itself by surrounding itself with others of its kind. Eventually, one culture will win.
So ignore the statement as a red herring and continue making the points you listed. A valid response. They will still harp about the poor native Americans, but I suppose you aren't going to convince them no matter what you say. These arguments are to benefit any third party reading.
So ignore the statement as a red herring and continue making the points you listed. A valid response. They will still harp about the poor native Americans, but I suppose you aren't going to convince them no matter what you say. These arguments are to benefit any third party reading.
People throughout history have overtaken lands. Romans took over England before the Saxons before the Danes.
The question of native is irrelevant. It’s a question of what culture we want to succeed us - do we want our culture to persist or do we want to be overtaken like the Babylonians or the Egyptians or the native Americans?
People throughout history have overtaken lands. Romans took over England before the Saxons before the Danes.
The question of native is irrelevant. It’s a question of what culture we want to succeed us - do we want our culture to persist or do we want to be overtaken like the Babylonians or the Egyptians or the native Americans?
It’s a question of what culture we want to succeed
Yes, this.
> It’s a question of what culture we want to succeed
Yes, this.
There was no America before whites.
There was no America before whites.
Neither are the injuns, they migrated to the Americas from Siberia.
Neither are the injuns, they migrated to the Americas from Siberia.
DNA evidence states we were also here first.(smithsonianmag.com)
DNA evidence states we were also here [first.](https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/the-very-first-americans-may-have-had-european-roots-5517714/)
All small tribes throughout all of history fought wars the same way and for the same reasons. Money and women. They attacked any other tribe, killed or enslaved the men, and took the women and girls. All Indians did this, Vikings did this, Japanese, Chinese, and niggers in Africa still do this today.
To the victor of war go the spoils, since forever. Might does in fact make right, to think otherwise will only eventually get you killed. You can't morally shame someone who breaks into your house and steals everything into not doing that.
All small tribes throughout all of history fought wars the same way and for the same reasons. Money and women. They attacked any other tribe, killed or enslaved the men, and took the women and girls.
All Indians did this, Vikings did this, Japanese, Chinese, and niggers in Africa still do this today.
To the victor of war go the spoils, since forever. Might does in fact make right, to think otherwise will only eventually get you killed. You can't morally shame someone who breaks into your house and steals everything into not doing that.
Laurese Van Der Post illustrated this perfectly writing about the African Bushman.
Laurese Van Der Post illustrated this perfectly writing about the African Bushman.
Current immigrants aren't coming to America, they're coming to Whiteland. There's a big difference between the two. Immigrants aren't looking for open spaces and the chance to build settlements and create new possibilities for self-governance and personal liberty. They want the "whitepeoplebuiltthis" lifestyle without all the work it took to actually build it.
Would they come to America without Americans, or go to Australia without Australians, or to Sweden without Swedes? Of fucking course not. So the "coming to America" argument is bullshit. They are coming to Whiteland for "whitepeoplebuiltthis" life. Because "whitepeoplebuiltthis" the White People of Whiteland get to say who gets in.
Current immigrants aren't coming to America, they're coming to Whiteland. There's a big difference between the two. Immigrants aren't looking for open spaces and the chance to build settlements and create new possibilities for self-governance and personal liberty. They want the "whitepeoplebuiltthis" lifestyle without all the work it took to actually build it.
Would they come to America without Americans, or go to Australia without Australians, or to Sweden without Swedes? Of fucking course not. So the "coming to America" argument is bullshit. They are coming to Whiteland for "whitepeoplebuiltthis" life. Because "whitepeoplebuiltthis" the White People of Whiteland get to say who gets in.
How did Cortes beat the Aztecs? By aligning with the tribes they had been brutalising. It's not new. Ever hear of the "Cheyenne Wedge"? England essentially wanted to rid itself of troublemakers, so shipped the Pilgrims to No. America. Did it again, to Georgia, and again to Australia. Their survival was at stake. They survived, and thrived- because they could.
How did Cortes beat the Aztecs? By aligning with the tribes they had been brutalising. It's not new. Ever hear of the "Cheyenne Wedge"?
England essentially wanted to rid itself of troublemakers, so shipped the Pilgrims to No. America. Did it again, to Georgia, and again to Australia. Their survival was at stake. They survived, and thrived- because they could.
England essentially wanted to rid itself of troublemakers
Now they invite them in and give them welfare.
> England essentially wanted to rid itself of troublemakers
Now they invite them in and give them welfare.
The "rulers" do.
The "rulers" do.
It’s not England doing that... it’s (((England))). Another example of a culture failing.
It’s not England doing that... it’s (((England))). Another example of a culture failing.
Correct.
Correct.
Almost all their major cities have muslim mayors. It is insane.
Almost all their major cities have muslim mayors. It is insane.
Just because a black guy fucked your wife first does that mean she isn't legally married to you?
Just because a black guy fucked your wife first does that mean she isn't legally married to you?
We were just migrants looking for a better life.
We were just migrants looking for a better life.
That also justifies their position.
That also justifies their position.
The right of conquest - it's yours only if you can hold it. This is why no one ever says "poor Byzantines, dispossessed from their ancestral home by Turks"
The right of conquest - it's yours only if you can hold it. This is why no one ever says "poor Byzantines, dispossessed from their ancestral home by Turks"