Why are you even commenting on this post if you dont respect the question or the answer? Dont answer that, it's a rhetorical question.
Typical female response. You don't want real answers here. You just want someone to empathize with you and reassure you that your fears are warranted. You don't seem to realize that the thing you fear here is actually everywhere. You are exposed every single day of your life to toxic substances yet you don't fear it because you don't know about it. But yeah, I'm the big meanie who poisoned your post with reality.
Don't post on Poal if you don't want replies like mine. Oh, and tits or GTFO.
Honestly i'm just shocked you bother fucking with me at all, if someone really doesnt like someone they just leave them alone. typical male response. You're welcome to comment on my posts and be an asinine dickhead with advice meant to be waste my time because you dont take me seriously, thats just fine, just dont expect me to offer you more than simple woman logic responses and downvotes. You know I'm a simple dumbass woman yet here you are wasting your time with me, doesnt make a lick of sense.
Honestly i'm just shocked you bother fucking with me at all, if someone really doesnt like someone they just leave them alone.
Lol! Don't flatter yourself. I answered your post because of the topic. It was not an attack nor was I fucking with you. You didn't even reply to me on my original comment and instead inserted yourself into a discussion I was having with another user. You went out of your way to go attack me in another part of the thread that didn't include you. The tables are turned...
You're welcome to comment on my posts and be an asinine dickhead with advice meant to be waste my time because you dont take me seriously, thats just fine, just dont expect me to offer you more than simple woman logic responses and downvotes.
Go back to my original comment and tell us all how that was me being a dickhead. If I didn't take you serious, I would ignore you entirely as I do with some others on this site whom I do not take serious.
You know I'm a simple dumbass woman yet here you are wasting your time with me, doesnt make a lick of sense.
I ignored your sex when I first commented on your post. I gave a mathematical/scientific answer that was free of sex/gender. Way to go making it about sex/gender when there was no reason to. That doesn't make a lick of sense...
theres lots of different reasons to not like someone from either gender if someone is unlikable or not, im sure theres plenty of male scrubs you dont like on here too. Honestly this comment here just sounded like you werent taking any of this thread seriously and you were just messing with me pretending to give usefull advice in your first comment. Not necisarily because of my gender, but because you dont like me as a whole. Im sure theres females out there you like and respect, i just doubt i'm one of them
OP is assuming the same thing. I'm making it uniform to prove a point. That point is the larger the area, the lower the concentration. There was not enough material released to warrant a 300-mile radius fear as OP implied. Also, the materials burned which changed them chemically and made other compounds. Much of the new compounds were not hazardous (CO2 and water and such). The hypothetical scenario needs only answered by a hypothetical answer. I did that to show the absurdity of being overly fearful here.
The hypothetical scenario needs only answered by a hypothetical answer.
dude what the fuck is that supposed to mean, non of this is hypothetical
Typical female response. You don't want real answers here. You just want someone to empathize with you and reassure you that your fears are warranted. You don't seem to realize that the thing you fear here is actually everywhere. You are exposed every single day of your life to toxic substances yet you don't fear it because you don't know about it. But yeah, I'm the big meanie who poisoned your post with reality.
I took your original comment seriously and was pondering it, then i read the comment chain with you and another guy where you were saying you were providing theoretical answers for a theoretical problem. Made me think you were just fucking around with me since you usually just come to my posts to find reasons to be mad. Because I dont think you like me and you try to mess around with me I have you type casted in my head as a blackpilled dick who looks finds more reasons to be blackpilled. I will treat you like that and if you dont like it, then you should get off of Poal or change your attitude.
I took your original comment seriously and was pondering it, then i read the comment chain with you and another guy where you were saying you were providing theoretical answers for a theoretical problem. Made me think you were just fucking around with me since you usually just come to my posts to find reasons to be mad. Because I dont think you like me and you try to mess around with me I have you type casted in my head as a blackpilled dick who looks finds more reasons to be blackpilled. I will treat you like that and if you dont like it, then you should get off of Poal or change your attitude.
Looks like you pre-emptively answered a question in my reply to you that you probably have not seen yet. Brava.
I commented on your generalized question in a general way since there were not enough hard constraints to do otherwise. That was logical and reasonable for back-of-the-envelope level science. In actuality, the answers are complex and hard to arrive at, but with a generalized concetration level thought experiment as I laid out, the roughness does suggest the fear should be minimal. There are just too many variables to work with, but it does indicate that the whole thing is blown out of proportion for the sake of fear. I've worked in a chemical plant that produced vinyl chloride. I don't recall there being a pick concern with it like with other materials we used or produced. I'd have to get the safety datasheet to see where it lands, but I'm quite sure it's not that bad and isn't going to stick around in a toxic form for very long. It's all about exposure amounts and time. That's what makes the difference in these events.
(post is archived)