Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

138

I know this is the most vanilla boomer 1990s Gingrich-ish of topics as the nation dive-bombs but interested in what lessons you think we'd put in place should we end up writing a new founding document.

I know this is the most vanilla boomer 1990s Gingrich-ish of topics as the nation dive-bombs but interested in what lessons you think we'd put in place should we end up writing a new founding document.

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

30-55

30 gives plenty of time to get out of the irresponsible "party phase". As well as giving you time to actually experience things like taxes and reality. By 30 you've begun to get set in your ways and have more confidence. 55 at the max because the best years are behind you and you begin to lose touch with the younger crowds. Everyone should be able to retire at 55.

25 years total in office is more than enough...too much really. You should be capped out at 2 terms for any public position. Keeps the rot out.

[–] • 1 pt

There's plenty of faggots who are 35 and still in party phase.

[–] • 1 pt

> There's plenty of faggots who are 35 and still in party phase.

True, but on average most people are out of that phase by then. You will always have outliers in any set. Can't beat the bell curve.

[–] • 2 pts

I don't think it is most anymore. Maybe it is geographically and media brainwashing/programming dependent? I had all my children before turning 35 and I'm considered an outlier among White people my age in my area. Of course, I'm not going to be the 70 year old at the high school graduation for my children...I should be there for my grandchildren, if we make it that long.

[–] • 2 pts

Not sure about that. I know a couple 12yr olds, either of them would be a huge improvement over Brandon.

[–] • 1 pt

I didn't really wake up to issues like human biodiversity and Jewish tribalism until I was like 30.

Maybe if I'd been exposed to those ideas more I would have woken up before then. Maybe not.

I don't know how old is too old. Definitely before 80. Probably before 70. 60 seems pretty safe.

30-65?

[–] • 1 pt

I think the kikes want us to put in limits of any kind. If we put limits on the representatives, the same should be applied to the staff. Otherwise, you'll just get the same schmucks calling the shots like we have in the White House and State Department. That demonic bitch Nuland has been through how many presidencies? The "Administrative State" is part of the problem, that's why Bush-43 made similar decisions to Clinton and Obama and Bush-42 and who knows how far back...it was the same people giving the President the same best option(s) (their preferred options) and actions (again, their preferred actions).

[–] • 1 pt

Age is less of a problem than personal life. 25 with a wide range of restrictions is better than 30 with none. No women, first and second-gen immigrants, no anti-Christians (yes that means specifically jews), no non-land owners, no debt, no non-fathers, no non-married, no people with zero public life experience as a representative.

90% of this is deep red people who would put even Zimbabwe as a first world nation.

[–] • 1 pt

There should be term limits on staffers.