n + 1
*n* + 1
You're always just one vaccination away from freedom.
You're always just one vaccination away from freedom.
One? You mean two! After all, how could you be protected with just four? Five is what you need, and don't let me hear you complain when you get all 7! OYVEY!
One? You mean two! After all, how could you be protected with just four? Five is what you need, and don't let me hear you complain when you get all 7! OYVEY!
Why are you dismissing the 8 boosters?
Why are you dismissing the 8 boosters?
I know, right? 9 is what we're suggesting, so get all 10.
I know, right? 9 is what we're suggesting, so get all 10.
Touche! KEK
Touche! KEK
I heard a new insult today. Tell me again, but tell it to me like I took a vaccine for a donut.
I heard a new insult today. Tell me again, but tell it to me like I took a vaccine for a donut.
good one :)
good one :)
Well, the initial vaxx was 2 shots. Then there was the booster. Then there was the bivalent booster. Now there's another booster.
I'm going with 5 to be a fully compliant pin cushion.
It's amazing people do not remember that they were lied to about the shot's effectiveness and risks. They are zombies that have signed up to become biological experiment recurring revenue streams for Pfizer.
Well, the initial vaxx was 2 shots. Then there was the booster. Then there was the bivalent booster. Now there's another booster.
I'm going with 5 to be a fully compliant pin cushion.
It's amazing people do not remember that they were lied to about the shot's effectiveness and risks. They are zombies that have signed up to become biological experiment recurring revenue streams for Pfizer.
Yea, the whole premise of mRNA is that the 'protection' is predicated on the antibody level. Covid19 mRNA jab is simply a 'short acting' gene-based therapy thus when the target antibody level naturally decreases over time (+6 months) the recipient is 'no longer protected' according to the new-era company soylence, thus requiring continual boosters. They have already began programming dumb normies that it's just like a yearly influenza jab.
Yea, the whole premise of mRNA is that the 'protection' is predicated on the antibody level.
Covid19 mRNA jab is simply a 'short acting' gene-based therapy thus when the target antibody level naturally decreases over time (+6 months) the recipient is 'no longer protected' according to the new-era company soylence, thus requiring continual boosters.
They have already began programming dumb normies that it's just like a yearly influenza jab.
Obviously it's an IQ test. Good luck to them.
Obviously it's an IQ test. Good luck to them.
The original plan was a booster every 6 months but that was rolled back to 1 a year. So 2 in the original shot circa 2021, a winter and summer booster in 22 and one going in winter 23. So 5, and this new one going in to 24 would be 6.
I have heard of people having 4, I have not heard of anyone getting 5 but it could be something they keep within their echo chamber.
The original plan was a booster every 6 months but that was rolled back to 1 a year. So 2 in the original shot circa 2021, a winter and summer booster in 22 and one going in winter 23. So 5, and this new one going in to 24 would be 6.
I have heard of people having 4, I have not heard of anyone getting 5 but it could be something they keep within their echo chamber.
As many as it takes for it to no longer profitable for Big Pharma.
As many as it takes for it to no longer profitable for Big Pharma.
14 days months shots to slow the spread...
14 ~~days~~ ~~months~~ shots to slow the spread...
Every fucking time
Every fucking time
Yes 8. I've already seen posts on other sites from the booster crowd and they are on 8.
edit: other site person is excited to be on the invitation list from NHS Fife (Scotland) for shot number 8 covid booster combo with flu
Yes 8. I've already seen posts on other sites from the booster crowd and they are on 8.
edit: other site person is excited to be on the invitation list from NHS Fife (Scotland) for shot number 8 covid booster combo with flu
Your next booster could be your last.
Mother in law recently got her 4th. Told her not to, but of course she didn't listen. Now she's in hospital with massively elevated CA-125 markers (though no cancer found in scans), peripheral edema and fluid buildup in her lungs and abdomen. Doctors remain baffled. They drained something like 3 liters of fluid from one lung (obviously the fluid is continuing to build up as they drain it). Even if the doctors are baffled, I'll posit that it's not cancer (CA-125 levels are a red herring) and that she is either suffering from kidney failure or heart failure, though there has been no acute coronary symptoms, so probably more likely kidney failure. The medical establishment will probably treat her for cancer, which will likely kill her if her kidneys aren't working well.
Your next booster could be your last.
----
Mother in law recently got her 4th. Told her not to, but of course she didn't listen. Now she's in hospital with massively elevated CA-125 markers (though no cancer found in scans), peripheral edema and fluid buildup in her lungs and abdomen. Doctors remain baffled. They drained something like 3 liters of fluid from one lung (obviously the fluid is continuing to build up as they drain it). Even if the doctors are baffled, I'll posit that it's not cancer (CA-125 levels are a red herring) and that she is either suffering from kidney failure or heart failure, though there has been no acute coronary symptoms, so probably more likely kidney failure. The medical establishment will probably treat her for cancer, which will likely kill her if her kidneys aren't working well.
Sucks to suck. I'm sorry for your loss. Sounds like she dug her own grave though.
Sucks to suck. I'm sorry for your loss. Sounds like she dug her own grave though.
Both my in-laws are stubbornly adherent to whatever the "experts" tell them. Which is baffling, they can say that the doctors have no idea what is causing their ailment, but when I point out the temporal correlation, and causal mechanism by which it could be the jab, as well as cheap and safe treatments (N-acetyl Cistine and Nattokinase to name just two, Ivermectin would also be good, but still hard to get here despite the "authorities" now saying that they never actually prevented people from getting it at all), they look at me like I'm a fucking alien.
Father in law also had 9 clots removed and 3 stents put in after his 3rd jab. Went and got the 4th anyway.
I imagine a large proportion of the jab injured are actually like this. They believed "the science", and when they are seriously harmed by the jabs, they don't want to accept that they made a stupid decision, that they were duped. So, they double down. Out of my parents and in-laws, 3 of the 4 have what I suspect to be likely serious adverse reactions caused by the jabs, from heart conditions requiring surgery to what I described above and severe chronic neurological conditions (my dad, who only got one shot because he was forced to by the government).
Both my in-laws are stubbornly adherent to whatever the "experts" tell them. Which is baffling, they can say that the doctors have no idea what is causing their ailment, but when I point out the temporal correlation, and causal mechanism by which it could be the jab, as well as cheap and safe treatments (N-acetyl Cistine and Nattokinase to name just two, Ivermectin would also be good, but still hard to get here despite the "authorities" now saying that they never actually prevented people from getting it at all), they look at me like I'm a fucking alien.
Father in law also had 9 clots removed and 3 stents put in after his 3rd jab. Went and got the 4th anyway.
I imagine a large proportion of the jab injured are actually like this. They believed "the science", and when they are seriously harmed by the jabs, they don't want to accept that they made a stupid decision, that they were duped. So, they double down. Out of my parents and in-laws, 3 of the 4 have what I suspect to be likely serious adverse reactions caused by the jabs, from heart conditions requiring surgery to what I described above and severe chronic neurological conditions (my dad, who only got one shot because he was forced to by the government).
They are the people who think doctors are the solution to all of their body's problems. And while that may be true occasionally, the vast majority of the time we need to just take care of our own bodies. Getting vaxed up sounds solid on paper, but it turns out it's POTENTIALLY LETHAL, and they have absolutely no interest in doing any independent research on the matter.
They are the people who think doctors are the solution to all of their body's problems. And while that may be true occasionally, the vast majority of the time we need to just take care of our own bodies. Getting vaxed up sounds solid on paper, but it turns out it's POTENTIALLY LETHAL, and they have absolutely no interest in doing any independent research on the matter.
(post is archived)