Catholics went to the shitskin shitholes to try to civilize and educate them so that later their lands and resources could be utilized with much less threat of being killed and eaten. They left them where they were though.

The jews, on the other hand, moved the shitskins to White nations to (((educate))) them and give them (((gibs))) so that they could rape, rob and murder us. They did this so they could later our land and resources would become (((theirs))).

The Catholics may not have done a good thing, but it was still far better than what they jews did and keep doing.

I'm pretty sure it was the Jewish wing of the catholics that roamed the earth and brought the shitskins to the 1st world.

If serious , mostly because "go forth and multiply" and the idea that God gave us the earth led to an early idea of Manifest Destiny. To save people is to add to Gods army that would eventually rise to defeat evil once and for all. Obviously a whole lot more with very much more nuance, but thats the idea.

Better than gathering grapes for jews for free.

Without catholics you wouldn't exist

Your question is loaded, a lie, and could have only been provided to you by Jews. The question raises questions about an agenda. The question is nonsense but a lesson in how properly subversive propaganda functions. From a propaganda perspective is very powerful, albeit very dishonest.

First of all, your question is a lie and had no basis in reality. Which Jew told you to ask? There's is nothing wrong expanding and teaching others of God. It helped civilize much of the world, end a lot of misery, and fuel growth and global influence for Europeans (restoring what was in place before the flood). It in no way attributed to the pro-Jewish conclussion you've invented here.

Secondly, Christianity wasn't the problem. The problem was and is Jews convincing everyone to bring non-Whites into White countries. Some to naturalize. Some for labor. Some for slaves. Christianity isn't a factor. And only a mind controlled by Jews will reach a different conclussion. The only way you can offer an alternative position is to claim Europeans should not have become global powers and should have never left Europe and should have never created America. Which continues to sound very pro-Jewish.

Why are you choosing to push what can only be described as subversive pro-Jewish, anti-Christian, anti-European propaganda?