WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts (edited )

I'm sure I'll catch flack from some purity spiralling fags or glowies, but sure why not.

1 Japs, no question. All internal ethnogroups ranked from north to south.

2 Koreans, south before north.

3 The practically extinct, high caste, fair skin indians, essentially caucasian indians.

4 There are multiple chinese ethnogroups and I'm somewhat ignorant but I know the northeast ones that spoke cantonese are superior to the han chinese masses by a fair margin.

5 Pacific islanders and native americans are easily ranked by distance from the equator and the high scorers like the east coast, northeast and eskimo tribes and the far southern tribes of new zealand like the samoans, maori and a few other coconut niggers; like han chinese the low ranks of these broad groups belong lower on the list like hawaiians.

6 mongolians

7 East russian mongrels

8 han chinese

9 Central asian mongrels

10 southeast asians, I have never known enough to pass a judgment for each nationality but I suspect that generally they get dumber and more useless on average along a north south and east west axis in which north vietnamese being north-easternmost is probably the most competent and south western myanmar in the opposite corner of the region being worst off.

11 pacific island nations between taiwan and australia excluding melanesia

12 Central india

13 various remaining american native groups ranked by proximity to equator including central and south america.

14 Southern india

15 Hawaiians and other equatorial pacific islanders not listed above.

16 australian aboriginals

17 melanesians

I probably missed a couple and might have some geographical errors.

[–] 2 pts

Philippines should be #2. They are generally Christian and hard working.

Thailand should also be in there somewhere toward the top. They have odd customs, however they also have an arrest warrant issued for bill gates.

IMO

[–] 1 pt

Great comment and just the kind of considerations I was hoping for.

[–] 1 pt

This is going to be one tough list. Not only do you consider their good traits, but also their bad ones. For example, many people would put Japan at the top automatically due to having the cleanest and safest society. But you have to factor in that you can go there right now and eat horse or dolphin meat. Or that things like scat porn are associated with Japan. Granted I don't know if the scat porn is still a thing, but you get the idea.

[–] 1 pt

Scat is associated with germany too, and I don't judge people too harshly on eating habits though I rank Han chinese lower for not just eating dogs but how they cook them.

Normalcy is relative in dietary norms but treatment of animals in general does reflect character.

[–] 1 pt

Can't we just go back to calling them Oriental's?

[–] 0 pt

OK, but start calling western stock occidentals, more specific than "caucasian" and not as reductive as "white"

[+] [deleted] 1 pt
[–] 1 pt

Why not all the way to Israel?? Also the pakis are the same as Indians.

The are all non-white and not allowed in my restaurant.

[–] 1 pt

Mongols > Japs > Everything else > pajeets

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Japs = Red Haired Chinese/Fair Skin Indians (extinct) > Hong Kong Chinks > Koreans (commie heavy-handed jew-flavored regime vs matriarchal pussy whipped bitchocracy, both micromanage you to hell, but at least South has good movies) > Mongolians (very strong culture and good contribution to music, but not much else, at least they don't act up) > Mainland Chinks (bug people) = Taiwanese (they can get just as cringe) > SEA niggers = Charlie niggers (both are extremely low iq, annoying and fucked up in all sorts of ways from what I've seen after interacting with them, Singapore is an exception I guess on par with Hong Kong, but their living conditions drive them to kill themselves pretty often) > biological waste > curry niggers = other riceniggers I didn't care to mention

[–] 1 pt

Charlie niggers? Do you mean coconut niggers?