Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

What could possibly be in Audrey Hale's Manifesto that causes the FBI to refuse its release based on it being "Astronomically Dangerous" and "a blueprint on total destruction"?

QUOTE: “What I was told is, her manifesto was a blueprint on total destruction, and it was so, so detailed at the level of what she had planned,” Metro Nashville Council Member Courtney Johnston told the NY Post, without elaborating. “That document in the wrong person’s hands would be astronomically dangerous,” she added.

Johnson claimed that the “the vast, overwhelming majority of it” would be too dangerous for the public to see. “I personally don’t want to know the depths to which her psychosis reached … When I’m told by an MNPD high-ranking official that it keeps him up at night, I’m going to defer to that person in that agency that I don’t need to read that,” she added."

Does that indicate the government helped "her" plan this? What could possibly be so dangerous?

What could possibly be in Audrey Hale's Manifesto that causes the FBI to refuse its release based on it being "Astronomically Dangerous" and "a blueprint on total destruction"? QUOTE: “What I was told is, her manifesto was a blueprint on total destruction, and it was so, so detailed at the level of what she had planned,” Metro Nashville Council Member Courtney Johnston told the NY Post, without elaborating. “That document in the wrong person’s hands would be astronomically dangerous,” she added. Johnson claimed that the “the vast, overwhelming majority of it” would be too dangerous for the public to see. “I personally don’t want to know the depths to which her psychosis reached … When I’m told by an MNPD high-ranking official that it keeps him up at night, I’m going to defer to that person in that agency that I don’t need to read that,” she added." Does that indicate the government helped "her" plan this? What could possibly be so dangerous?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (42).
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

It probably contains explicit statements about targeting Christians and children for murder because Christians are fighting back against the grooming and trooning of kids.

It probably validates all the Christian narratives regarding the LGBTQ freaks seeking to sexualize and convert children. It may even contain her own story of conversion to troon-cult by sexual molestation at a young age and then continued grooming once outside of her parent's influence.

The most dangerous information it could contain is direct and explicit confirmation of what we know to be true but that the media suppresses.