WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

530

All over the place the commentary and main posts are about how "racism is discrimination with power structure, ergo blacks cannot be racist". There are so many flaws with the logic: what about Africa where only blacks have built a country? Does racism exist there? Why was the definition changed and by who? Where does the term 'racist' even originate in the first place?

I know the answers to most of these, but if there is a suggestion or two, other than avoid the groid and their handlers, I am curious to hear it.

I suppose the desired outcome of my post/question is further educational materials.

EDIT to clarify: "Racism" was coined by Bolsheviks, so the question is purely rhetorical in that it doesn't exist, but I want to see their cognitive dissonance come into play.

All over the place the commentary and main posts are about how "racism is discrimination with power structure, ergo blacks cannot be racist". There are so many flaws with the logic: what about Africa where only blacks have built a country? Does racism exist there? Why was the definition changed and by who? Where does the term 'racist' even originate in the first place? I know the answers to most of these, but if there is a suggestion or two, other than avoid the groid and their handlers, I am curious to hear it. I suppose the desired outcome of my post/question is further educational materials. EDIT to clarify: "Racism" was coined by Bolsheviks, so the question is purely rhetorical in that it doesn't exist, but I want to see their cognitive dissonance come into play.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

It’s a lose-lose scenario. Either the individual is too stupid or brainwashed to have any kind of intellectual debate on the subject, or they are at least intelligent enough to know it’s bullshit but it serves their interests. Either way there is no room for an honest discussion.