WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

Correlation or causation? Nature or nurture...

Correlation or causation? Nature or nurture...

(post is archived)

[–] 12 pts

Whites are a completely different subspecies to blacks, so forget about the mainstream out of africa nonsense for a start. Whites are different to other non-black races because of cold climate diets that were basically carnivorous, precipitating brain volume increases. On a broader level the transition from primate to scavenger to hunter gatherer and the accompanying changes in diet drove human intelligence development.

This change in brain volume based on diet can even be seen in vegetarians. Studies have shown brain volume decreases on a vegetarian diet, with one study noting that the largest vegetarian brain in the study was about the same size as the smallest omnivorous brain. Generally there is a correlation between animal food consumption and health and longevity, with certain whites like the French being at the top, and obviously east Asians. The American standard diet is about 90% plant based.

[–] 6 pts

To be fair. Most vegetarians are simply weak people trying to virtue signal. They had small brains to begin with.

[–] 0 pt

A vegetarian diet has been utilized to get rid of cancers. That involves 14 glasses of fresh juiced vegetables daily so hardly the same as to what you are talking about. Gerson Therapy is the name.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

Yeah, that sugar overload is what killed off jobs. Well that and the aids and pancreatic cancer.

Cancer feeds on sugar. On the contrary, going full keto kills off or slows it down enough so you die of something else

[–] 0 pt

So does fasting. No juice required

[–] 0 pt

Nothing wrong with it. Ancient Buddhism is a very genuine philosophy to me. If you exercise and eat right, there is no need for meat, imo.

[–] 11 pts

I think we already possessed that intellect.

Prairie niggers lived in pretty much same climate like Europeans and never developed anywhere near our level.

[–] 3 pts

Great point (Eskimos).

[–] 2 pts

I think Eskimos are a different extreme. In the Arctic tundra there was insufficient growing season to allow for the growing of food and fodder crops necessary to survive over winter. That left them tied to a hunting lifestyle, in which intelligence above that needed to hunt was unnecessary.

Indians lack of more sophisticated technologies in more temperate areas would be evidence of the innate, or previously evolved, mature of higher intelligence of Caucasian and Arian people.

[–] 7 pts

It's in the difference between ha adam and eth ha adam

*The Adamic Race is White!

Incidentally, the name "Adam" (aw-dawm) -- first applied to the man in Genesis 2:19 and not applied to the creation account in Genesis One -- literally means "ruddy", taken from the Hebrew word (aw-dam) that means "to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush [blush] or turn rosy" (Strong's #119). This, it should be noted, is only possible with those who are white-skinned because other skin colors do not show flushing or blushing, and do not "turn rosy."

Writes Charles A. Weisman:

"Another unique aspect about Adam was his race. All Scriptural evidence indicates Adam was created a white man. Evidently the various "colored" types were created before Adam. The name "ADAM" (aw-dawm') in Hebrew means a "ruddy human being" (Strong's O.T. #120). It is derived from Strong's O.T. #119 -- ADAM (aw-dam'), which means "to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy." Only the white race has the characteristic of blushing or showing blood in the face or skin" (The Origin of Race and Civilization, Weisman Publications, Burnsville, MN 1996, p. 57).*

Above from... https://www.hope-of-israel.org/twocreationsaccts.html

[–] 6 pts

Pre-planning for food and shelter forces intellectual evolution or the species dies off. So yes, harder enviournments make for creatures that have adapted.

In Africa, food is plentiful, killing your neighbor ensures your genetics survive as there is more for you.

In Europe, killing your neighbor, when you need to work together to survive the winter, hampers your genetic survivability. Hence empathy.

[–] 5 pts

It's not quite that simple or Eskimos would be the smartest, most advanced civilization on Earth. It seems that people also need an environment that is temperate enough to allow larger clans to develop into stable communities. That way new ideas and inventions can be tested, trading ideas and products with other clans begins, there is genetic mixing beyond relatives (inbreeding reduces IQ) and written records and drawings accelerate civilization. It appears that Northern Europe was the ideal climate and geography to create human superiority.

[–] 3 pts

I'd say a combination of both. Whites being the superior race have traversed the entire earth and made settlements wherever it saw fit.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

Traveling back then was not much different from dreaming now. You had no idea what was going to happen but you knew that if you kept moving it would keep changing. What I'm saying is once they get started the imagination is inspired and constantly motivated. I think the stepping stones to high intelligence were very rapid for anyone that braved travel. But our darker cousins tended to stay down in the bushes. That is a very uninspiring state. Even if intelligence has put there it will wither

[–] 2 pts

Dude what are you up to on sat night? Me and walt are doing a younger dryas episode of his runecast podcast. This actually will tie in.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

Younger dryas impact? I have a few theories about that. You know all those ancient, ancient civilizations? Like the ones in South America that had pyramids with stones too large or to advanced for the Incans to build, or the ones that may have built the great pyramid or Atlantis. Well, there are many stories that tie those together and I have a theory that ties all of it together with genesis, the fall of "lucifer" and the war on the heavens and the lost civilizations. You can probably guess what my theory is based off that. It's a really interesting topic.

[–] 1 pt

U should join the discussion as well. Join us this sat

[–] 1 pt

I might join. Could be pretty tired from trip though

[–] 1 pt

I wish i traveled more. Grass is always greener. If i was i'd just be bitchin about traveling so much and bitchin about home. Happy is complicated as always.

[–] 2 pts

Whites became more intelligent by eating mostly fatty meat and getting an insane amount of exercise in the cold which fed our brain with lots of fat and growth hormone

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Nature or nurture

Nurture has it's nature in nature. Our superior genes make us superior nurtureres.

[–] 1 pt

What is Environmental Selection theory?

In a nutshell, Seasonal environments selected for future visualization & delayed gratification, while Tropical environments did not.

Point 1: In a Seasonal environment, if you can't figure out that the seasons will change, and food may be unavailable for months at a time, you're dead. In a Tropical environment, the only seasons are wet/dry. The food that is there today will be there tomorrow will be there next week. Why worry?

Point 2: In a Seasonal environment, if you don't spend today collecting food & firewood for the winter (ants & grasshoppers), you're dead once the winter comes. In a Tropical environment? See point 1. No penalty for fucking the farmer's daughter all day rather than gathering food.

Point 3: In a Seasonal environment, if you do not build a shelter that can withstand both snow & wind pressures, you're dead. In a Tropical environment, the only shelter you need gives you shade & a dry area.

This explains why Seasonally selected peoples, Asians & Whites, have millennia of history & culture while Tropical peoples live primitive lives.

There was no environmental factor that forced them to be anything but base "humans".

To learn more about Environmental Selection theory, please read the excellent book, "Erectus Walks Among Us" available for free at the following link:

https://unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ErectusWalksAmongstUs-Unz.pdf

[–] 1 pt

Natural selection does not imply that "features" emerge randomly

given current level of complexity, they are designed

so, we had a brain and therefore we where able to survive

yes ues, I know, and where does God comes from ? I will ask this to Him, eventually, if I can

Load more (7 replies)