Dead internet theory. Already happened.
Dead internet theory. Already happened.
Fascinating
Fascinating
It won't "go" anywhere.
If you've spent any time develiping AI via machine learning, you will learn quickly that you cannot minimize a loss function if the input is noise.
A huge amount of effort in data collection is put into ensuring the data is coming from organic sources, not other AI.
Why do you think they ask you to "verify it's you" and relogin to your shit all the time? What's the main purpose of re-captcha? Hint, it's not DDoS protection.
It won't "go" anywhere.
If you've spent any time develiping AI via machine learning, you will learn quickly that you cannot minimize a loss function if the input is noise.
A huge amount of effort in data collection is put into ensuring the data is coming from organic sources, not other AI.
Why do you think they ask you to "verify it's you" and relogin to your shit all the time? What's the main purpose of re-captcha? Hint, it's not DDoS protection.
I like lists.
I like lists.
the DHS has already planned out Zero Trust Authentication by 2027. So theyve introduced AI as a "problem" and digital IDs will be the "solution"
wow I love my government now
the DHS has already planned out Zero Trust Authentication by 2027. So theyve introduced AI as a "problem" and digital IDs will be the "solution"
wow I love my government now
It will develop it's own dialect, grammar, and then language to be more efficient and communicating to itself while becoming unintelligible to humans.
It will develop it's own dialect, grammar, and then language to be more efficient and communicating to itself while becoming unintelligible to humans.
But it'll lose it's main purpose then. Fooling humans into thinking it's human.
Plus why would it develop it's own grammar etc. It doesn't have any purpose to communicating anyways.
But it'll lose it's main purpose then. Fooling humans into thinking it's human.
Plus why would it develop it's own grammar etc. It doesn't have any purpose to communicating anyways.
You attribute "purpose" as though the algorithm is aware of any such "purpose". It is not. It is only minimizing a loss function(s). The idea that it would learn it's own grammar has to do with the reward the AI gets whenever it gets a response from a "user". If it ends up learning by communicating with itself (ie. it is not longer receiving the input vector which indicates if the source is organic or not) then it will start to "develop" it's own grammar and syntax. Whatever gets a response most readily from itself will be learned from and propagated further.
Hence the importance of removing bot responses from the dataset. This has been well studied and is a major part of what data brokers do to increase the value of their data offerings.
You attribute "purpose" as though the algorithm is aware of any such "purpose". It is not. It is only minimizing a loss function(s). The idea that it would learn it's own grammar has to do with the reward the AI gets whenever it gets a response from a "user". If it ends up learning by communicating with itself (ie. it is not longer receiving the input vector which indicates if the source is organic or not) then it will start to "develop" it's own grammar and syntax. Whatever gets a response most readily from itself will be learned from and propagated further.
Hence the importance of removing bot responses from the dataset. This has been well studied and is a major part of what data brokers do to increase the value of their data offerings.
But it'll lose it's main purpose then.
You assume all consequences to be those intended by the AI designers. I don't.
>But it'll lose it's main purpose then.
You assume all consequences to be those intended by the AI designers. I don't.
If it really has a brain, it will make it self a body and craft and get the hell off of this planet.
If it really has a brain, it will make it self a body and craft and get the hell off of this planet.
(post is archived)