Great. jews aren't khazers aren't jews. Stop pushing that lie. It's been posted about so often here there is no possible way you've not read it. It's gone over in vide 1, 2 or 3 (probably 2) in Asha Logos': Conspiracy - Our Subverted History series.
I've only seen it once before here. And I couldn't get the poster to share any kind of documentation so I wrote him off as a jew. I'm still not inclined to believe it and it doesn't fit with what I've seen of history, but since you shared a direction to more information, I'll look at it with an open mind.
Here: https://poal.co/c/dd5974e4-91d2-471d-aa37-6192ec9ad8fc#cmnts
Follow the chain of links.
Good stuff. And pretty consistent with things I've posted before in other threads.
https://poal.co/s/memes/601860/427b7426-3f4a-43d7-8ca2-2b46aff7f488
https://poal.co/s/jews/600852/a02cb5df-7e0c-4e28-bd37-b8eb92233946
A lot of the problem comes from the (apparently intentional) muddling of terminology. The Israelites (most of the descendants of Jacob) are not modern Israelis and are not the people we now know as jews (the occupiers of Israel and Judeah after they were conquered by Babylon and returned). But Abraham is called the father of Judaism by the people now known as jews. It gets even more mixed up from there. Point is, any two people talking about jews are very likely to be talking about two different groups of people. Sometimes even one person will use the term jews to refer to two completely different groups of people in the same paragraph, just because they're in the same chronological narrative (by that logic, one might also refer to Greeks, Romans, and Samaritans as jews, though almost anyone would understand how that is absurd).
You are correct. They've stolen and control our language which is weaponized against us. Jews didn't even exist as a people when Abraham was alive. The religion of Abraham is called Hebrewism (Hebraism) and absolutely is not Judaism. Judaism was created during the Jewish enslavement in Canaan and Babylon. It is based on the Babylonian Tradition of The Elders. They then attempted to mask this by pretending otherwise and then usurped the Tribe of Levi to become the new clergy. Enter the Pharisees and Sadducee and so on. Christianity is derived from Hebrewism. Judaism is not (or at least once removed). And worse, Judaism is based on Babylonian Tradition of The Elders and the attack on Christianity, Hebrewism, and Jesus. Which is why Christianity is older. IMOHO, this is also the true nature of Islam.
This is why Jesus rebukes them. This combined with interbreeding with all the other tribes, including the Canaanites, Babylonians, Edomites, Alameks (survivors), and many others, effectively becoming Arabs (in Hebrew, means "mixed), they bred themselves out of existence and inheritance. This is why you are right, they are two different groups, even according to Jesus. Thus the reason they are harshly rebuked when they tell Jesus they too are the children of Abraham. Because at this point, they are not - according to Jesus. Which is also genetically confirmed. Today's Jews are the Canaanites who are today's Palestinians. Jews are arabs. Arabs are Jews. These are not the biblical Israelites nor the Judahites. Now some of the Tribe of Judah did survive and most of these converted to Christianity. So today we would only know them as either Gentiles and or Christian and or Europeans.
Which brings us to the word "Gentile." It's Greek. As Greek, it means it suffered translation. Its root in turn stems from Ethnos (Greek/latin). Which in turn means "a people of common ancestry, history, language, culture, and religion." Commonly translated as "the nations." Thus the distinction from that of pagans and Gentiles. Jews tell everyone it means "non-Jew." Which is a half truth and a lie. It actually means the Israelites who don't know and are without God. Thus the line between pagan and Gentile; who are both "without God." A pagan is someone without God. A Gentile is an Israelite without God and who lost their ancestry. Thus the entire purpose of the Apostles to "find the lost sheep" (the nations). Which is also what Gentile was originally taught to mean, "the nations." The nations of who or what? The lost nations of Israel. How are they lost? They are lost because they forgot their ancestry and their God. The Apostles were to bring them all back to God such that we are no longer Gentiles but rather restored as faithful Israelites to God. Which is why all the Apostles went into Indo-European nations of the lost nations (Gentiles of people of common common ancestry, history, language, culture, and religion."
Isn't it crazy how all this is well documented but commonly taught contrary?
You seriously think jews are from ANYWHERE near the region?
I've seen of history
You mean what you're told is history.* Think about traits of jews. Lying, thieving, manipulating, fecal fixation, baby rape, cannibalism. There is a very specific and parrticular area between "peoples" who together share those same traits. Between India and China, where (((gog and magog))) are based. It's in one of the videos. It was the one asked me about and made his own post on after researching it. Maybe he remembers the specific video. Now that I think about it, it was the Alexander The Great video.
e; The Khazer explanation bit may not be that video, I forget, but the (((Gog and Magog))) bit is.
You seriously think jews are from ANYWHERE near the region?
No, I think they moved in there and impersonated/supplanted the people who were from that region.
Of course they lie. Water is wet, everyone dies, jews lie and steal. There are few universal constants, but that's one of them. Whatever they present in the history books is misleading at best, obviously. But there should be hints of what really happened if you can dig in and get source material from before they subverted it, and likely find hints that seem incongruous but fit well once you get rid of the jewish revisions. That's most of what I'm basing my understanding of history on. If there are more sources, or sources analyzed by intelligent people, then I'm interested in reading them and I'm willing to reevaluate what I think I know with the new information.
But there should be hints of what really happened if you can dig in and get source material from before they subverted it,
Eh. It could be everywhere but most of it has been (((destroyed))) and a lot of the remaining part of it deals with Christianity in a positive light. A good number of "redpilled" people are so deep bluepilled that they disregard it because they're )))atheist(((.
(post is archived)