Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

636

A subverse currently exists on POAL where informed debate is HIGHLY discouraged, either agree with the glowniggers or get banned. How totalitarian.

3 banned users in the 2 days it has existed.

Straight from the https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new page sidebar -

About this sub

This isn't a "free speech" sub.

The 3rd Reich didn't encourage open debate about sexually degenerate communist propaganda; they burned the propaganda.

If you defend gayops here, you will be banned.

PS: Libertarians are useful idiot pussies.

https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new

Isn't this subverse against POAL ToS? Did the owner violate POAL ToS by creating a sub that defies free speech?

AOU, If this kind of subverse abuse is okay by POAL ToS, can I create some too?! And everyone else? See where this would end up? This trend is not a good direction for POAL.

A subverse currently exists on POAL where informed debate is HIGHLY discouraged, either agree with the glowniggers or get banned. How totalitarian. @AOU 3 banned users in the 2 days it has existed. Straight from the https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new page sidebar - #About this sub >This isn't a "free speech" sub. >The 3rd Reich didn't encourage open debate about sexually degenerate communist propaganda; they burned the propaganda. >If you defend gayops here, you will be banned. >PS: Libertarians are useful idiot pussies. https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new Isn't this subverse against POAL ToS? Did the owner violate POAL ToS by creating a sub that defies free speech? AOU, If this kind of subverse abuse is okay by POAL ToS, can I create some too?! And everyone else? See where this would end up? This trend is not a good direction for POAL.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (77).
[–] • 0 pt

I'm not familiar with the rules around sub creation, I've never created one here.

[–] • 0 pt

This has nothing to do with the rules around sub creation. This has to do with handling a sub. Additionally it's always been that free speech is about global rules the admin (AOU) won't curtail. Subs can do as they please (within TOS / the law) as any user of level 6+ (I think 6+) can make a sub if the current one is to their disliking and they feel they could do it better.

[–] • 0 pt

Can you point me to an all inclusive ToS doc with this info? That would be awesome! I looked around earlier but onybfound an updated ToS memo.

[–] • 1 pt

No because this is a retarded thread, a retarded question and it's precisely the same type of complaint that sleeper and new accounts make and have made for the last few years as a means to attack poal.

Is it a free speech issue when a nigger in a public school class is told to shut the fuck up when he's itnerrupting the teacher and class? No it's not and only a read would think it is.

Is it a free speech issue if in Group Report time a nigger is told to stay on task when he starts talking about niggerball instead of the semester report? No it's not and only a reatd would think it is.

Free speech isn't all encompassing. Additionally free speech is only good in a high-trust, homogeneous society. Otherwise antagonists within will use this free speech to destroy you.