Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

A subverse currently exists on POAL where informed debate is HIGHLY discouraged, either agree with the glowniggers or get banned. How totalitarian.

3 banned users in the 2 days it has existed.

Straight from the https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new page sidebar -

About this sub

This isn't a "free speech" sub.

The 3rd Reich didn't encourage open debate about sexually degenerate communist propaganda; they burned the propaganda.

If you defend gayops here, you will be banned.

PS: Libertarians are useful idiot pussies.

https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new

Isn't this subverse against POAL ToS? Did the owner violate POAL ToS by creating a sub that defies free speech?

AOU, If this kind of subverse abuse is okay by POAL ToS, can I create some too?! And everyone else? See where this would end up? This trend is not a good direction for POAL.

A subverse currently exists on POAL where informed debate is HIGHLY discouraged, either agree with the glowniggers or get banned. How totalitarian. @AOU 3 banned users in the 2 days it has existed. Straight from the https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new page sidebar - #About this sub >This isn't a "free speech" sub. >The 3rd Reich didn't encourage open debate about sexually degenerate communist propaganda; they burned the propaganda. >If you defend gayops here, you will be banned. >PS: Libertarians are useful idiot pussies. https://poal.co/s/OperationTrust/new Isn't this subverse against POAL ToS? Did the owner violate POAL ToS by creating a sub that defies free speech? AOU, If this kind of subverse abuse is okay by POAL ToS, can I create some too?! And everyone else? See where this would end up? This trend is not a good direction for POAL.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (77).
[–] • 0 pt

This has nothing to do with the rules around sub creation. This has to do with handling a sub. Additionally it's always been that free speech is about global rules the admin (AOU) won't curtail. Subs can do as they please (within TOS / the law) as any user of level 6+ (I think 6+) can make a sub if the current one is to their disliking and they feel they could do it better.

[–] • 0 pt

Can you point me to an all inclusive ToS doc with this info? That would be awesome! I looked around earlier but onybfound an updated ToS memo.

[–] • 1 pt

No because this is a retarded thread, a retarded question and it's precisely the same type of complaint that sleeper and new accounts make and have made for the last few years as a means to attack poal.

Is it a free speech issue when a nigger in a public school class is told to shut the fuck up when he's itnerrupting the teacher and class? No it's not and only a read would think it is.

Is it a free speech issue if in Group Report time a nigger is told to stay on task when he starts talking about niggerball instead of the semester report? No it's not and only a reatd would think it is.

Free speech isn't all encompassing. Additionally free speech is only good in a high-trust, homogeneous society. Otherwise antagonists within will use this free speech to destroy you.

[–] • 1 pt

I've been here many years, actively posting after VOAT went down. I always thought POAL was essentially 100% free speech just like VOAT.

Additionally free speech is only good in a high-trust, homogeneous society.

Since we don't seem to have that here, you're telling me POAL has no place for open and honest debate where you are free to speak your mind, bring receips, discuss and debate their truth, think for yourselves? You must succumb to the authoritative sub owner's biases, misconceptions, opinions and untruths or GTFO? Or have I misunderstood your statement?