Are There No Class Action Suits Against the US Govt. over Jab Mandates and/or The Lockdowns?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (34).

[–] • 2 pts

(edited )

Your comment is based on a false premise. You're implying that I said something about suing the pharma companies over the vax injuries. Problem is, no one said anything about a suit against the pharma companies over vax injuries. The post title specifically says the mandates (which were ordered by federal government) and the lockdowns (which were ordered by federal government). So, the suits in question would be brought specifically against the federal government over those two specific issues. And theoretically, you could also go after state governments, municipalities, and businesses that went along with all that shit.

So the issue you cite is a different one entirely. But to your point, yes I'm aware that pharma was given liability protection. However, that protection was based on certain stipulations. The more data that comes out (largely by FOIA lawsuits), the more it shows that they committed fraud, and fraud is not protected in their liability deal with the federal government.

And yes, I understand the hurdles and DS fuckery involved even if someone brings a legitimate lawsuit. But even so, such lawsuits need to be brought anyway...if for no other reason than to further highlight the corruption/DS fuckery.

There are three ways to address government tyranny:

1) The courts 2) The vote (peaceful revolution) 3) Violent revolution

That's it, there is nothing else.

Numbers 1 and 2 are rigged to varying degrees. That much is clear. But those two avenues should be exhausted ad nauseum just for the simple fact that a redress of grievances is preferable under those conditions. #3 is a last resort and should only be used once it's clear to everyone (IE people well beyond those on this site) that #'s 1 and 2 are completely useless. Which, hey, at this point they may very well be completely useless. But this needs to be further proven to the normies..and the way to do that is to continue to hammer away at options 1 and 2 until either A) something changes for the positive or B) enough normies understand how useless #'s 1 and 2 are.

Your comment is based on a false premise. You're implying that I said something about suing the pharma companies over the vax injuries. Problem is, no one said anything about a suit against the pharma companies over vax injuries. *The post title specifically says the mandates (which were ordered by federal government) and the lockdowns (which were ordered by federal government).* So, the suits in question would be brought specifically against the federal government over those two specific issues. And theoretically, you could also go after state governments, municipalities, and businesses that went along with all that shit. So the issue you cite is a different one entirely. But to your point, yes I'm aware that pharma was given liability protection. However, that protection was based on certain stipulations. The more data that comes out (largely by FOIA lawsuits), the more it shows that they committed fraud, and fraud is not protected in their liability deal with the federal government. And yes, I understand the hurdles and DS fuckery involved even if someone brings a legitimate lawsuit. But even so, such lawsuits need to be brought anyway...if for no other reason than to further highlight the corruption/DS fuckery. There are three ways to address government tyranny: 1) The courts 2) The vote (peaceful revolution) 3) Violent revolution That's it, there is nothing else. Numbers 1 and 2 are rigged to varying degrees. That much is clear. But those two avenues should be exhausted ad nauseum just for the simple fact that a redress of grievances is preferable under those conditions. #3 is a last resort and should only be used once it's clear to everyone (IE people well beyond those on this site) that #'s 1 and 2 are completely useless. Which, hey, at this point they may very well be completely useless. But this needs to be further proven to the normies..and the way to do that is to continue to hammer away at options 1 and 2 until either A) something changes for the positive or B) enough normies understand how useless #'s 1 and 2 are.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

You’re better off just planning for #3, the federal government is collapsing albeit a little slower than we’d prefer.

parent
link