Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

361

I can’t believe that at this point, there’s not. But on the other hand, I have heard of no such things.

I can’t believe that at this point, there’s not. But on the other hand, I have heard of no such things.

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

Why? There's no liability for the (((mRNA shot))) manufacturers and no liability for the ((((ZOGSA))). What would the lawsuit be for?

[–] • 3 pts

There is liability if its proven there was a conspiracy. Say from a foreign country.

[–] • 1 pt

No, you honestly think israel would ever be held liable for this? You're retarded.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Lol good luck trying to get foreign interference to fly in a court room.

There is no liability for the jab manufacturers.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah okay! you may have to wait 30 years for it to be common knowledge that certain countries conspired to release a bio weapon on the world.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

Your comment is based on a false premise. You're implying that I said something about suing the pharma companies over the vax injuries. Problem is, no one said anything about a suit against the pharma companies over vax injuries. The post title specifically says the mandates (which were ordered by federal government) and the lockdowns (which were ordered by federal government). So, the suits in question would be brought specifically against the federal government over those two specific issues. And theoretically, you could also go after state governments, municipalities, and businesses that went along with all that shit.

So the issue you cite is a different one entirely. But to your point, yes I'm aware that pharma was given liability protection. However, that protection was based on certain stipulations. The more data that comes out (largely by FOIA lawsuits), the more it shows that they committed fraud, and fraud is not protected in their liability deal with the federal government.

And yes, I understand the hurdles and DS fuckery involved even if someone brings a legitimate lawsuit. But even so, such lawsuits need to be brought anyway...if for no other reason than to further highlight the corruption/DS fuckery.

There are three ways to address government tyranny:

1) The courts 2) The vote (peaceful revolution) 3) Violent revolution

That's it, there is nothing else.

Numbers 1 and 2 are rigged to varying degrees. That much is clear. But those two avenues should be exhausted ad nauseum just for the simple fact that a redress of grievances is preferable under those conditions. #3 is a last resort and should only be used once it's clear to everyone (IE people well beyond those on this site) that #'s 1 and 2 are completely useless. Which, hey, at this point they may very well be completely useless. But this needs to be further proven to the normies..and the way to do that is to continue to hammer away at options 1 and 2 until either A) something changes for the positive or B) enough normies understand how useless #'s 1 and 2 are.

[–] • 0 pt

You’re better off just planning for #3, the federal government is collapsing albeit a little slower than we’d prefer.

[–] • 0 pt

Injunctive relief. Just because you can't recover damages doesn't mean you can't stop them from happening.

[–] • 0 pt

Yes it does. jewTUS already ruled there's no legal or criminal liability for the US government or the (((vaxx)))) companies for (((vaxxines))) even if they lie and are caught. You guys need to educate yourselves.

[+] [deleted] • 0 pt
[–] • 3 pts

The kikes aren't done profiting off of pushing the (((jab))) so they aren't ready to switch to profiting off of denouncing the (((jab))). Once the money dries up on the one hand they will switch to the other hand and sue for damages in class action lawsuits where only the kike lawyers profit. It's their usual tricks as with all pharmaceutical garbage drugs over the years.

[–] • 3 pts

There are several lawsuits against the federal government right now on the jab mandates. Ones for military, federal employees, and federal contractors.

There's also been lawsuits against local governments and private employers, and at least one settled with employees.

As far as injury lawsuits, I've heard of a couple here and there against counties and states, but I have no idea if any have gone very far.

It's extremely hard to prove a vaccine (or any drug) injury in court beyond a reasonable doubt. Someone would have to die within minutes and have a doctor willing to testify as to the cause. Good luck with that, and convincing an attorney to take that one for less than six figures, more likely seven.

However, I'm sure it'll eventually happen, but decades down the road. That's typically how long it takes to build up a class action lawsuit for widespread medical injuries and have all the pieces fall into place.

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah, the big one seems to be that Arron siri litigation lawyer, who sued phizer for the release of all there vaxx trial data and then fought and won the ridiculous 55-75 year delay as well. Here is his substack Aaron Siri(https://substack.com/profile/32334676-aaron-siri)

[–] • 0 pt

Part of the problem has been the lack of attorneys specializing in religious freedom litigation. Helping people keep their jobs isn't exactly a high paying field, and I know several of these firms rely on donations to help make ends meet.

[–] • 1 pt

You're the only person who actually answered my question. Thanks for that.

[–] • 0 pt

Sure, theres quite a lot of stuff going on , that is deliberately not been aired on msm. Substack seems to have become one of the few places that today's vaxx 'outcasts can actually converse and disseminate actual qualifiable data and info.

[–] • 1 pt

Id like there to be one against local walmart where the greeters who were in charge of the door and wouldnt just take a "My doctor advised against the vaccine" response to let me in, but demanded to know what condition I had for the doctor to advise me to not vaccine. Boy did they get an ear full. Havent been back since.

[–] • 0 pt

Imagine you're charged with a crime. But the prosecuting lawyer is your brother, the defence lawyer is your uncle and the judge is your best friend. They'd all work together so you go free, right?

It'd be the same thing with any lawsuit over mandates and lockdowns. It'd be rigged. The judge, prosecution, and defence would all be working together to put on a show.

Also, a government employed judge - who got to a high enough position to rule over a case like this - would never find the government guilty of something this big.

They do use rigged lawsuits to shut down issues. But right now, they want to stay silent and not bring attention to the mandates and lockdowns, because they may want to use them again.

[–] • 0 pt

I think this is true in many cases. But no one is even trying to bring such a suit, to my knowledge at least. I also don't think that every judge in the system is corrupt. If all of them were, then the government would never be found guilty of anything, and that's not the case.

My larger point, bring a suit (or several suits) and then force the DS to openly show just how corrupt they are.

[–] • 0 pt

In Australia, the state premiers (leaders) have numerous lawsuits against them by various professional bodies. One has more than 50, apparently. I cant confirm this for sure, as the news says nothing, buy have seen a few notices in trade newsletters to suggest it is at least partially true.

[–] • 0 pt

Have you ever tried to sue the government?

We investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong. We won't even send anyone to court to listen.

[–] • 0 pt

I get that. But some suits are successful.

[–] • 0 pt

To their utter dismay, this fact isn’t driving Patriots to act out.

[–] • 0 pt

There were. They blocked the executive order to force companies with more than 100 employees to force everyone to get jabbed. They blocked the madate for all federal employees.

[–] • 1 pt

Ahh yes. True.. the courts told OSHA where to stick it..but then some businesses mandated it anyhow. So they should be sued.

[–] • 0 pt

Absolutely. Every business that mandated it should be sued. Cities that forced restaurants to demand Vax cards should be sued.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah that was the other half of it. What cities and states did to businesses. Certain municipal and state governments should be sued into bankruptcy.

[–] • 0 pt

Not to mention, by the time the fucking OSHA ruling came down, a shit ton of people had already got the jab under threat of government coercion. Not everyone could afford to wait it out and see what the courts would do. Those folks should be suing the shit out of basically everyone.

Load more (2 replies)