Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

I watched 3 hours of Europa the final battle and in the doc he said that hitler invaded Poland as a retaliation for Bloody Sunday. The doc also claims that this massacre was essentially orchestrated by Jews in order to get Germany to start ww2.

Bloody Sunday was when polish people massacred the German minority in Poland. This happened on the 3rd of September.

Now from literally every image and source I can gather, germany invaded Poland on September 1st. I have not found a single newspaper image or article or book that is different from this date.

This would mean that the poles actually killed the Germans in response to the invasion. This is a big issue because it essentially eviscerates all credibility this doc has for me.

If the film maker can brazenly lie about something so easy to find out is bullshit, then how the fuck am I supposed to take any of this serious?

Please feel free to show me any evidence you have that Poland killed the Germans BEFORE hitler invaded. Otherwise I think I have been severely brainwashed.

I watched 3 hours of Europa the final battle and in the doc he said that hitler invaded Poland as a retaliation for Bloody Sunday. The doc also claims that this massacre was essentially orchestrated by Jews in order to get Germany to start ww2. Bloody Sunday was when polish people massacred the German minority in Poland. This happened on the 3rd of September. Now from literally every image and source I can gather, germany invaded Poland on September 1st. I have not found a single newspaper image or article or book that is different from this date. This would mean that the poles actually killed the Germans in response to the invasion. This is a big issue because it essentially eviscerates all credibility this doc has for me. If the film maker can brazenly lie about something so easy to find out is bullshit, then how the fuck am I supposed to take any of this serious? Please feel free to show me any evidence you have that Poland killed the Germans BEFORE hitler invaded. Otherwise I think I have been severely brainwashed.

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

many contemporary "sources" are simply not credible. most confessions made at the nuremburg trial were either gotten by torture, duress, or threatening the persons family members. hitlers speeches also offer a great deal of clarity. we are fighting against a narrative built on lies. when you understand the simple fact that hitler did not want war, and only fought back when he absolutely had to, things get easier to figure out. go with your gut.

[–] • 2 pts

most confessions made at the nuremburg trial were either gotten by torture

Reminder that something like over half of the Germans who confessed at Nuremburg had CRUSHED TESTICLES.

Yeah, that's how you get a man to admit to gassing people in a shower room, you fucking pop their balls one at a time until they agree to say what you want them to.

[–] • 0 pt

fucking ghastly behavior on the americans part.. no excuse.

[+] [deleted] • 1 pt
[–] • 0 pt

Or the Brits...

[–] • 3 pts

I found this: https://www.unz.com/article/why-germany-invaded-poland/

It states Germans were being killed before Bloody Sunday. It also explains the shit poland was doing to Germans.

The comments also point out many of the sources come from a singular “historical” source

This shit is fucked. It’s really fucking hard to find actual historical facts anywhere.

[–] • 6 pts

>On August 7, 1939, the Polish censors permitted the newspaper Illustrowany Kuryer Codzienny in Kraków to feature an article of unprecedented candor. The article stated that Polish units were constantly crossing the German frontier to destroy German military installations and to carry captured German military materiel into Poland. The Polish government failed to prevent the newspaper, which had the largest circulation in Poland, from telling the world that Poland was instigating a series of violations of Germany’s frontier with Poland.[33

How bout that.

[–] • 1 pt

Roosevelt,. lying dog knew that those mutt poles started shit at Danzig, no surprise.

[–] • 1 pt

True. Wars are chaotic, so timelines are hard to establish in terms of what happened when or what triggered the other.

There was also the Gleiwitz Incident, in which a German radio station was attacked on August 31. It was later labeled a “false flag” due to the testimony of an SS at Nuremberg, which we all know was a totally honest and above board proceeding.

[–] • 2 pts
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

They omit a lot of stuff too.

Hitler got funding out of ny from the same international bankers who funded the communists.

While Hitler was openly building up his military the world says they didn't know, while they funded him and obtained international help in doing so. What are the implications?

Hitler was in secret talks with GB and America. This is well documented. No one talks about it.

The EU today was Hitler's vision for Europe.

Hitler actively worked with Zionist Jews and brokered deals.

Hitler's personal driver and friend was a Jew. His personal doctor was a Jew. His family doctor was a Jew whom he called a Nobel Jew.

The communists helped build part of Hitler's war machines and provided steel to build navy ships.

Any documentary omitting facts is propaganda. Lots of propaganda on both ends of the spectrum. Think about the obvious implications and why so many tiny brains implode on this fact.

You can see for yourself today who controls the brownshirts, communists, and (Ukraine and US) nazi's (Jews and feds).

Hitler retired in South America and the CIA, FBI, and Mossad knew it. They allowed him to retire. Think about that.

Hitler's outcome was a brother war and the murder of millions Aryans and Christians. Christianity never recovered. The allies killed almost all Christians in Japan - the largest collection of Christians and church in all of Asia. Jewish global population grew significantly.

Jews become very angry when facts are presented.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

The bolsheviks that destroyed Russia from within traveled west on their way to the "holy land" and their kike-hive mentality destroyed every people/culture along the way.

They weren't "Russian" (genotypes) and I can't help but wonder how the fuck they "started" in Egypt went straight to Russia and our current history "starts" with the rise of the ruriks . That is until you look at the coastlines and realize that when the kikes were tossed out of palestine they were pushed south and east. Which is why all those fucking nasty roach people all look alike.

It only makes sense to understand why "orientals" are asshole ugly...it's because the kikes ravaged the original slopes and what remains today is the hybrid goblins people ...which is why they're such obedient slaves with IQ's that make them just smart enough to obey orders but who lack any "left brain" capability ( imagination /creation / philosophical..etc)

The kikes have made a full circle now. The started in palestine , went all the way down and around "5000 years wondering", destroyed a full path along the indian ocean, came up and around through russia and then headed back north west to get back to that catbox toilet .

So, those "poles" who fought against the GOOD guys, were most likely forced there by their kike masters who'd pushed them to die off (to the tune of 25 million) in the same way the ukrainian people are being forced to fight against russians. It's all a kike game to get white men to kill white men and destroy any essence of white men...the same way they did to those original slopes.

[–] • 0 pt

bolsheviks

You were doing good until you cucked. The who? Because what you're doing is like me saying;

The Carbon based life forms that ...

State who. Don't be a nigger.

[–] • 0 pt

Well "bolshevik" simply means 90% jews and 10% traitors.

I thought that was a known fact on this site and the users who frequent. No ?

[–] • 0 pt

The who that made the decisions were 100% jews. 0% of anyone with any power in any bolshevik power structure was a goy. Zero. To claim otherwise is... well... stop being a kike.

[–] • 0 pt

The territory and the population switched very often there. Look at the maps and the development from 1900 on. I read a book once, where the mistreatment of the germans by the polish have been explained in more detail and shit didn't start with hitler only, but way before. Also don't forget that poland had got allied military guarantees for support in case of an attack and they might have felt save to fuck with the germans because of a false sense of security. So, if the stuff I've read in that book long time ago is true, germans on polish territory lived in real danger way before 1939.

[–] • 0 pt

Germany put out a document soon after the invasion was over detailing Polish atrocities. They showed many pictures of civilians killed brutally (bayonets, bludgeoning, bullets, etc) and in advanced states of decay (predating the invasion). They've also told several stories of civilians rounded up and death marched at the beginning of the war all the way to the east of the country. Finally, at least one British diplomat mentioned rough treatment of civilians prior to the war breaking out.

White paper: https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/atrocities/pagmp000.html

Could the atrocities be fake? Sure. We've just got their word for it. Everyone in the west ignored it, and post war hundreds of thousands of books were burned by the Allies occupying Germany. Nearly every German that had been living in disputed territory was ethnically cleansed, exiled or killed. Even today it's illegal in Germany and Poland to produce apologia in any form for the 3rd Reich. Could they be real? I'd say there's a high chance.

[–] • 0 pt

watch this vid, it documents well the silesian issue in 1921 and how poles even then were doing such acts: https://youtu.be/HwDAorQnd4U

like you however i've never seen proof of the claim of the 50k massacre, but you can see in the vid above which is historical fact that something pretty close to it happened, but the numbers are likely exaggerated.

Load more (3 replies)