Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.5K

I'm not allowed to make a real poll, so I'll try it this way:

  1. Fuck the vatniks, Glory to Ukraine
  2. Fuck the hohols, Glory to mother Rossya
  3. Fuck the russian jews, glory to the ukrainian jews
  4. Fuck the ukranian jews, glory to the russian jews
  5. Glory only to the Azov battallion
  6. Fuck the Azov-Battallion, they must be denazified
  7. The Azov-Battallion is controlled by kikes

And how does poal see the military aid and the arms the west gives to the ukrainians?

  1. Boohoohoo, can't help whites that are being zerg-rushed by the mongol horde because of muh inflation
  2. Boohoohoo, can't help whites that are being zerg-rushed by the mongol horde because of muh nuclear escalation
  3. Russia is fighting for white nationalists here, even though their army is made up of mostly shitskins by now, and white/russian nationalists have been wiped out in russia by putin's government, and he says, that he wants to denazify a white country, and he allies russia with pretty much only third-world shitskin nations, and the whole russian identity bases upon the fact, that they sent 20 or so million young russians to their death to destroy muh evil nazis in the name of glorious communism, so don't help the pawns of the jews in ukraine prevail against the pawns of the jews in russia!
  4. send more weapons to Ukraine, the more the merrier, so that Ukrainians can repel invading mongol hordes
  5. send more weapons to Europe, the more the merrier, so that disarmed Europeans can repel invading hordes
  6. Guns are bad, muh goberment should ban them all.
I'm not allowed to make a real poll, so I'll try it this way: 1. Fuck the vatniks, Glory to Ukraine 2. Fuck the hohols, Glory to mother Rossya 3. Fuck the russian jews, glory to the ukrainian jews 4. Fuck the ukranian jews, glory to the russian jews 5. Glory only to the Azov battallion 6. Fuck the Azov-Battallion, they must be denazified 7. The Azov-Battallion is controlled by kikes And how does poal see the military aid and the arms the west gives to the ukrainians? 1. Boohoohoo, can't help whites that are being zerg-rushed by the mongol horde because of muh inflation 2. Boohoohoo, can't help whites that are being zerg-rushed by the mongol horde because of muh nuclear escalation 3. Russia is fighting for white nationalists here, even though their army is made up of mostly shitskins by now, and white/russian nationalists have been wiped out in russia by putin's government, and he says, that he wants to denazify a white country, and he allies russia with pretty much only third-world shitskin nations, and the whole russian identity bases upon the fact, that they sent 20 or so million young russians to their death to destroy muh evil nazis in the name of glorious communism, so don't help the pawns of the jews in ukraine prevail against the pawns of the jews in russia! 4. send more weapons to Ukraine, the more the merrier, so that Ukrainians can repel invading mongol hordes 5. send more weapons to Europe, the more the merrier, so that disarmed Europeans can repel invading hordes 6. Guns are bad, muh goberment should ban them all.

(post is archived)

[–] • 6 pts

Why would I give a fuck about another country when my own country is getting so fucked up?

[–] • 0 pt

I don't understand why it is so important that your country is fucked up when it comes to helping out another country that's staunchly nationalist. It sounds like you'd like to spread the misery in your own country onto others, or think, that it's okay, if other countries are being overrun by the soviet army because kikes made you depressed, or something like that.

I really don't understand that mindset. I mean, yeah, the west is fucked up. But why would you be against it, or would not care, when it once in a while actually does the right thing?

In my opinion, the west should escalate this conflict as much as possible, so that it enters an existential fight against another power-block that actually has the means to wage such a conflict. I mean, you can pretty much say, that the russians are in large parts responsible for the refugee crisises in europe. Their game became pretty obvious last year, when the belorussians tried to flood poland with shitskins, after the russians have caused another refugee-flood to turkey, which then led them through to europe. I would say, that this smoldering conflict is worse than an actual war, especially because having traitors, subversives and outright enemies on the inside is nothing that a nation can afford during an existential conflict. And I think, that that's what we all want. Getting rid of subverts, traitors, and the enemy from within. Escalating this war is the best way to achieve that.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Escalating this war is the best way to achieve that.

Yes dood! Fucking for Virginity

[–] • 1 pt

So you want to keep things calm and comfy, so that there's no need to root out the traitors that are responsible for the weakening of the west?

[–] • 0 pt

In my opinion, the west should escalate this conflict as much as possible

Ok.

[–] • 2 pts

I mean, seriously. The alternatives are, that a 98% white and now ultranationalistic country gets raped by the soviet army, which to 70%+ is made up of mutts or asians.

If the west escalates, this conflict will soon get existential, and this will create the hard times we all hope for.

The conflict already is existential for the russian leadership, because they'll end up death or in prison if they lose too badly. They now are in a situation where they must cling to power until death, because they'll be killed or imprisoned as soon as they lose their position. So russia from now on must be considered as a tyrannical dictatorship. With that in mind, an nuclear exchange is on the table, if russia loses too badly, so that their leadership becomes threatened militarily. They will certainly wage economic war against and activate their fifth column of shitskins, that by now is in every country, and has been invited by kikes and traitors. Those will create huge problems for the west, and will make it simply too expensive to tolerate the ongoing subversion. And when it becomes necessary to ignore muh human rights of traitors, the next step is to put them in camps and/or make traitors and subverts disappear, which ultimately is what we all should strive for.

And in this case, all the stars are aligned towards that end. The only ones that seemingly want to prevent that are rightwingers, that seemingly have been conditioned to become contrarians instead of performing independent thought.

Am I wrong?

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts

This is Poal. We don't consent to anything.

[–] • 3 pts

I consent to this.

[–] • 5 pts

Secret option #B fuck you!

[–] • 2 pts

I thought it was option F.

[–] • 1 pt

F is for friends who do stuff together duh! (youtu.be)

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Now why do I feel I am not high enough to watch this as intended. It's like watching Rick and Morty for the mentally disabled but not as entertaining. :)

[–] • 1 pt

Fun fact: I invented the fuck-you option.

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts

Can't make a poll so you go against site rules away.
Glow (((moar)))

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

*Provides overly detailed psych report, presented as an opinion poll*

*Psych report about "the current narrative"*

Not interested in helping this glowfag determine Poal's political persuasion.

[–] • 0 pt

I take it then that you're just one of the contrarians, who's just against everything mainstream, no matter what?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Not being contrary for the sake of being contrary.

Being contrary, in this instance, because even if you are benevolent, the post you made serves as a psych report for intel groups.

[–] • 0 pt

You're trying to subvert the community by making paranoid and unsubstantiated claims about random people being fed-kikes. Maybe you're just a schizo-untermensch, but I think that it's more likely that you're projecting from yourself onto others.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

You're either a retarded wigger or a fed/jew posing as one. It makes little difference which.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

I don't want to pay for it and hope it ends w/ the lowest possible death toll regardless of who wins. Slav should not be killing slav.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Commence operation human shield; release the Ukrainian anthrax/small pox/plague on the Ukrainian citizens and blame Putin, was the original title of the planned assault I believe.

[–] • 0 pt

Most of the russian army isn't slav though, but asian or mutt.

[–] • 3 pts

both ethnic white russians and ukrainians will lose, because the jew is at the wheel in both countries.

nothing good will come of it..

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I mostly agree with John Mearshimer. US meddled in Ukraine, the country joined NATO in all but name, there was a US-backed coup in 2014, Russia's security was threatened and they had to respond. I find it telling that this isn't one of the options in your post. You lack even the most basic understanding of the situation in Ukraine.

[–] • 0 pt

So you mean that Ukraine doesn't have the right to not be associated with russia, and join alliances against it instead, despite russia already having committed acts of genocide against ukraine during the holodomor, and being a shithole that has nothing to offer other than being a prison of nations?

I find the opinion, that anyone should be forced to be part of the russian sphere cuz they want it so is so stupid, that I didn't think anyone on poal would consider it. Besides, nato is an defensive alliance, that only threatens russia, if they plan to invade. Which means, that the current invasion proves, that ukraine had very good reasons to join nato.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

So you mean that Ukraine doesn't have the right to not be associated with russia, and join alliances against it instead, despite russia already having committed acts of genocide against ukraine during the holodomor, and being a shithole that has nothing to offer other than being a prison of nations?

I said no such thing.

nato is an defensive alliance

Ahahahahahahahaha... wait, you serious?

[–] • 0 pt

Yes. Nato members don't have to be part of america's adventures in shitskin-country, and many refused to in the past. Member why under George Walker french fries were renamed into freedom fries because the french didn't want to be part of the coalition of the willing?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Downvoted because OP downvoted a comment he didn't like. (archive.ph)

[–] • 0 pt

downvoted a comment he didn't like.

a subversive comment. He's accusing random people of being fed-kikes for writing stuff that he doesn't like. Do you really want to defend this behavior?

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

He claimed you are a fed because of your sketchy post. On anonymous forums one must be extremely cautious. Given that, the best option when one comes across a post like yours is to point out that it could very well be a fed kike.

Instead of ignoring it, or combating the claim, you simply downvoted his comment. Thus, I replied in kind.

[–] • 0 pt

You're talking about an unsubstantiated claim in an low-effort-post, which in my opinion looked like it's been made either by an idiot or a chatbot that's meant to derail and subvert the conversation. This I've pointed out.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I say it's none of my business, that the Ukraine must have been doing something to require a response, and that the world should stand back and let things take their natural course. One thing I know for certain, a lot of politicians seem to have family business interests in the Ukraine, which makes me think that maybe the Ukraine is an essentially lawless country that provides money laundering services to the global elites and allows them to conduct forbidden bioresearch there.

[–] • 0 pt

Alternative explanation: They're rich in natural resources which they want to provide to europe in exchange for money and becoming part of the club. Russians don't like this, because they think, that ukraine is their own turf, and feel threatened by the competition, because with a western-aligned ukraine russia would lose much of it's blackmailing-potential over europe.

Hunter Biden was "employed" by an ukrainian oil-company. They found huge fields of natural gas in eastern ukraine, which they tried to exploit before the russian secret-police facilitated the secessionist aspirations in the oil-rich parts. They did pretty much the same with georgia a couple of years earlier, when they wanted to provide a pipeline between europe and the caspian sea.

Russia acts out of imperialism and because they want to protect their gas-racket, which pretty much pays for their entire (pretty tyrannical) government.

There's absolutely nothing justified about their war, and people who pretend that it is really reming me of yuri bezmenov's demoralized people, which whom one can't argue anymore.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

So by "want to provide to Europe" you mean "join NATO?" Overtures of which would be viewed as "imperialist aggression" by the Russians, just as Russian overtures to Cuba and Venezuela and El Salvador and Nicaragua were viewed that way by us in the Eighties, triggering Iran-Contra and our funding of the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan, through our asset of the time, Osama Bin Laden.

History is too stupid to repeat itself, it just dribbles out in similar but decreasingly-potent spurts. And we're the crusty socks that absorb that noxious product all too well. Sorry to disagree with you, fellow sock! But History is also a book that can be interpreted differently by every reader.

[–] • 0 pt

So by "want to provide to Europe" you mean "join NATO?"

Well, they don't want to be russia's bitch anymore, and that's nothing new, but has been a constant thing for centuries now. Remember that they didn't want to join the soviet union, and Wehrmacht soldiers were actually greeted with flowers by the ukrainian populace during WW2.

However, not being russia's bitch anymore of course means being able to protect oneself from russia's incursions. And this means joining Nato. Or else russia will just invade and just destroy their country. That's why pretty much all of eastern europe is extremely pro-US and pro-Nato.

And comparing ukraine's situation with the cuba crisis is plain stupid and a result of propaganda. The situation is, that when given a chance everyone wanted to flee the russian sphere of influence because, despite of it's propaganda, russia is a shithole with a society that in many regards is worse than even some african countries. However, this shithole is far worse when it comes to imperialism than even the Neocons during the 2000s were, so if russia's neughbors don't join another power-block, they'll either be invaded, end up as some russian sattelite state that's totally dominated by russian intelligence and subversion.

Well, and the dissident right seems to be entirely duped by russian propaganda. I mean, despite the russian government being staunchly anti-white, anti-western, imperialistic as fuck, and historically the biggest supporters of anti-white and anti-western subversion ever, the dissident right still sucks up to this government, that's being led by a KGB official and pretty much exclusively former soviet officials. I can't understand why. The dissident right is against providing weapons to nationalists in another country that are fighting against a tyrannical state that's invading their homeland with an army full of muslims and mongols, that wants to destroy their culture, keep them in poverty, and turn them into just another shithole. The dissident right is even badmouthing actual right-wing death squads that are killing literal communist shitskins.

The most demoralized group, according to yuri bezmenov's definition, really seems to be the dissident right at the moment.

[–] • 0 pt

Azov is run entirely by jews, they have a nationalist facade to get high morale fighters but are ziopigs at its core. juden use then like meat puppets.

Russia has every justification to be doing what it's doing. Ukraine has been firmly raped by jews since 2014 and any nationalist worth their salt would be fighting the kosher foreskin eaters that are giving them orders.

Zelensky is literally a jew and called Ukraine 'big israel'.

Let Russia destroy the juden in Ukraine and stay the fuck out

[–] • 0 pt

Russia won't destroy the Juden. The russian leadership is kiked as much as the ukrainian is, if not worse.

[–] • 0 pt

sure it is. Ukraine is literally led by jews, not crypto jews literal outward kikes. poroshenko sent ukrainians to kill russians in the east. thats the story. keep glowing.

[–] • 0 pt

I happen to know someone from eastern ukraine. Their income dropped by 2/3 and people there are horrified by the very real possibility of being pressed into their Volkssturm, where they'll get handed an old russian uniform with a steel helmet and 1/3 of an old Mosin-Nagant, and be sent out to be used as cannonfodder. Russians are notorious for their disregard of their own soldiers. Believe me, people in eastern ukraine aren't happy about the russian invasion.

Anyways, the situation is, that they sent ukrainians to the east to kill invaders, i.e. the most right-wing thing possible.

[–] • 0 pt

The Azov Battalion deserves to be denazified because they lack autonomy and will, unchecked, allow all the masonic/jesuit world rulers to create another world war that kills tens of millions of whites.

Load more (5 replies)