WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

Reading this just now is the first time I have felt legitimate concern that this will escalate into war between the United States and Russia. Russia gave a very clear and precise warning that if we directly Interfered we would face repercussions like never before in the history of our country. The United States admitting that we were involved in the sinking of that ship is us calling his bluff. This seems like a terribly reckless thing to do.

I'd like to hear your thoughts on this. What do you expect to happen going forward?

The seems like a very big story, a line was just crossed.

Reading this just now is the first time I have felt legitimate concern that this will escalate into war between the United States and Russia. Russia gave a very clear and precise warning that if we directly Interfered we would face repercussions like never before in the history of our country. The United States admitting that we were involved in the sinking of that ship is us calling his bluff. This seems like a terribly reckless thing to do. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this. What do you expect to happen going forward? The seems like a very big story, a line was just crossed.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

"Destroy" is fairly ambiguous. Russia could do a LOT more with conventional weapons if they wanted to actually hurt Ukrainians. As a random example, all their rail lines, roads, power stations, water stations, etc etc etc, are all still up and working. It wouldn't take nukes for Russia to destroy it all, and it's only because this isn't an actual war that any of those things are still working.

There is a massive difference between trying to remove a political group vs actually "destroying" a country. Your argument mostly just makes you look like the retard here. Did the US need nukes to destroy Iraq or Libya, or do you think Libya is doing fine and dandy?