WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

708

Been giving a lot of thought to this. Whatever we currently has seems to sucks balls, rules by corporations and Israel. Don’t really know what to believe anymore.

I see Nazi stuff here (string central gov) but also anti Fed/anti Gov and pro Confederacy. I guess there’s several opinions floating around.

In your opinion what is the best form of government, and why?

Is it monarchism? Fascism? Demo Repub? Democracy? Anarchy? Etc.

Been giving a lot of thought to this. Whatever we currently has seems to sucks balls, rules by corporations and Israel. Don’t really know what to believe anymore. I see Nazi stuff here (string central gov) but also anti Fed/anti Gov and pro Confederacy. I guess there’s several opinions floating around. In your opinion what is the best form of government, and why? Is it monarchism? Fascism? Demo Repub? Democracy? Anarchy? Etc.

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

Republic. Anything with the word "democracy" in it is already a non-starter.

[–] 4 pts

Monarchy

[–] 0 pt

The worst

[–] 1 pt

It can be. Because it's the most effective. So if your king sucks ass. Your in for a shit life.

Find a good king and prosper.

[–] 4 pts

No better king that Jesus.

[–] 0 pt

Its like saying just pick better politicians.

[–] 1 pt

Why? Monarchys had maybe 10% tax rate and didn't let niggerd or jews in their countries

Well they did then it all went to shit

[–] 0 pt

What would a monarchy look like with jews in charge?

[–] 0 pt

Interesting take, care to explain why? Or any reading material?

[–] 3 pts

So I've been reading Plato recently. He came to the conclusion in a republic without a democracy is the best form of government.

He also came to the conclusion that democracy itself is extremely evil. If you have 51 stupid people and 49 smart people and they are in a democracy the stupid people control the smart people.

The national socialist would call this upsetting the natural order. Because the natural order is the strong and the smart should rule over the weak and the stupid.

I recommend reading Vril: The coming race. Some people claim this book is a true story.

In The coming race it is explained to the traveler "We find the family amongst us who has their house in the best order and we radiate that order to all other families"

Which brings me to the entire point. So you want to be a conservative that conserves a society or conserves a culture.

What would be the easiest simplest and best way to do that?

You find what you consider to be a model family that is living the perfect caricature of the culture that you wish to conserve. Then you prop that family up to ensure they survive. Because if that family survives that culture that you are defending will survive.

Which brings me to monarchies.

Monarchies are model families that their culture can look up to and gain inspiration from. A monarchs power wealth and historical noteworthiness is directly and proportionately tied to the flourishing of its people and land.

If you have a great King your people your culture will thrive will become wealthy, you will rule over your enemies and they will sing your names and praise what you've done for centuries upon centuries.

A great King will preserve your culture and values and even your genetic lines with his life.

If you have a terrible King you will suffer you will be poor and your culture will be thrown into the dustbin of history.

Such is natural order. The great should be allowed to rise to greatness and the weak should perish or be subjugated.

[–] 1 pt

Really interesting take and I appreciate the feedback rather than just a simple two sentences. I haven’t read much Plato, tried in college but the professor was a total dbag and made it miserable so I never went back. Yeah a full democracy I don’t like because that’s just mob rule and mobs are really really dumb. I mean look at BLM that’s mob rule and it’s dumb.

I had thought that maybe monarchy was the way. Like the age of kings but like you said it has to be one who is the ideal and preserves the culture and takes care of his people. Then he will have people loyal to him and their fellow countryman. What we have now is politicians loyal to whom ever pays them the most money. I added that Vril book to reading list. Let me know if you have any other books, nonfictional as well.

[–] 0 pt

Many times kings are in power because they are born into it and not the smartest, bravest, or greatest of the people. But if they are a good king then what you say is true. Real natural order would be to have no orders, or anarchy. I don't want to live in that. But I also don't want to live with the government living up my asshole 24/7. So the best would be just basic elected government responsible for defense of the borders and the countries production/economy using tariffs and different trade deals. A federal force of lawmen that investigate serious crime. Elected justice system.

[–] 3 pts

> Kike free, OP. Kike free.

[–] 3 pts

American constitution when it said only white land owning males could vote...

Right their perfection

[–] 2 pts

Government is a necessary evil and should be kept small in powerless over the citizens, there for the People should be the Governing body. But America Fucked that experiment up about 100 years ago.

So Im going with Anarchy.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

The same people who manipulate our government, media, and financial institutions would just switch modes. There are always subversive people with wealth and power that want to control things, and anarchy offers no resistance to that.

Government is a necessary evil, but it's a very dangerous evil. Most people cannot resist the temptation to use it against their opponents or to enrich themselves at others' expense.

[–] 2 pts

The only good government is local givernment. The bigger and more remote government grows, the less responsive it becomes to the general will of the people in any given region.

[–] 1 pt

Idk even local school boards go on power trips now a days

[–] 1 pt

None. Small communities of strong men and obedient wives, with larger coalitions between communities. And no jews or niggers.

[–] 1 pt

So like tribal or clan like? I could see that

[–] 0 pt

We evolved to live in small communities where we know everyone. Larger ones involve abstract systems that allow exploitation.

[–] 1 pt

None.

[–] 0 pt

So warlords? I don’t see how actual none would work.

[–] 0 pt

Consider how often the government does jack all that benefits you. Now consider what they do which harms you, how much it costs, and what it would cost you to pay for any miniscule benefits yourself.

If a homogeneous, honest society existed, a free will socialist type society could flourish. I grew 100 acres of whatever this year? Here's what I need for the year. I'll trade the rest for beef, clothes, and whatnot. I wanna go to an old style barter system. You don't produce anything or have a skill? You starve.

In the reality we live in, the yearning for power and control will corrupt any form of governance.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Here's what I need for the year. I'll trade the rest for beef, clothes, and whatnot.

So you want a free-market, the opposite of socialism.

I wanna go to an old style barter system.

We have a barter system now. People usually prefer to barter for currency. Currency is a trade good like any other.

[–] 0 pt

You can't compare the corruption we have with a fantasy uncorrupted government. That is what all the retards who push for communism and socialism are doing despite both proving to be worse in practice than what we have.

The US has the best government as far as I can tell. Just imagine how awesome it would be without jews.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

white, Christian, ill funded constitutional republic who's only source of revenue is tarrifs on imports.

[–] 0 pt

The US government that existed before the illegal 1871 creation of the United States OF America corporate gov't.

Load more (11 replies)