Nothing in the Constitution authorizes them. The U.S. doesn’t need them.All supporting arguments in favor of them are moot.
Nothing in the Constitution authorizes them. The U.S. doesn’t need them.All supporting arguments in favor of them are moot.
Unconstitutional
Unconstitutional
Yes. They should both be agencies staffed by White American men, for the benefit of land owning White American men, who should be the ones deciding America's foreign and domestic policies. In the absence of that scenario, fuck em. Disband them and let this monstrosity of a country burn.
Yes. They should both be agencies staffed by White American men, for the benefit of land owning White American men, who should be the ones deciding America's foreign and domestic policies. In the absence of that scenario, fuck em. Disband them and let this monstrosity of a country burn.
These organizations don't necessarily need to be dissolved, but their entire leadership structure needs to be gutted.
These organizations don't necessarily need to be dissolved, but their entire leadership structure needs to be gutted.
The bigger question, Is there any argument against dissolving the U.S. government?
The bigger question, Is there any argument against dissolving the U.S. government?
Yeah, how do you expect niggers to get free crack pipes and sail foams without the government? What are they going to do, steal them? I highly doubt it.
Yeah, how do you expect niggers to get free crack pipes and sail foams without the government? What are they going to do, steal them? I highly doubt it.
Is this a rhetorical question?
Is this a rhetorical question?
The overwhelming levels of corruption in their ranks should be enough argument itself.
The overwhelming levels of corruption in their ranks should be enough argument itself.
If you understand that they are entirely corrupt and serve only jews then there is no valid argument.
However, if you were to argue with a normie you would need to overcome the following objections. The FBI is necessary to police potentially corrupt local governments. They are the ones who can investigate politicians. Assuming they weren't corrupt, that would be an extremely important task.
They are also the ones who have nation wide jurisdiction which is necessary for investigating and fighting interstate crime, and crime syndicates.
The CIA, if they weren't corrupt, would be an important intelligence gathering institution. Obviously the same can be done by any organization with a different name, or even the military; but in theory they are specialists is covert intelligence gathering.
If you understand that they are entirely corrupt and serve only jews then there is no valid argument.
However, if you were to argue with a normie you would need to overcome the following objections. The FBI is necessary to police potentially corrupt local governments. They are the ones who can investigate politicians. Assuming they weren't corrupt, that would be an extremely important task.
They are also the ones who have nation wide jurisdiction which is necessary for investigating and fighting interstate crime, and crime syndicates.
The CIA, if they weren't corrupt, would be an important intelligence gathering institution. Obviously the same can be done by any organization with a different name, or even the military; but in theory they are specialists is covert intelligence gathering.
These two agencies mostly work against Americans or to fatten their pockets illegally (drugs, etc.). They've lied repeatedly under oath and will continue to do so. There is also the NSA and I'm not certain how each of these agencies support each other.
These two agencies mostly work against Americans or to fatten their pockets illegally (drugs, etc.). They've lied repeatedly under oath and will continue to do so. There is also the NSA and I'm not certain how each of these agencies support each other.
(post is archived)