It's not even remotely true, brother. Nothing. Total fabrication. A creation built within your mind bulwarked by the steel I-Beams of human psychology. It will fall the moment you decide to stop looking for justifications to keep it aloft.
Speaking of EGO responses...
"I don't want to be like all the "sheep" so I take the opposite side just to be different, like all the other sheep on the opposite side."
It's all good though. You can live on the same planet as I do and have your own beliefs. I do my research and analysis on what makes the best sense to me. I don't need to make up stories to fill in the gaps in my own knowledge or thought and I don't watch TV or movies anyway. You do you and I will do things the way I do. We're probably both wrong anyway, but we won't know that in this lifetime.
Your EGO was burned so you attacked mine in response. Since you have a belief motivated by EGO therefore it seems you've interpreted my lack of belief as ALSO founded on EGO.
But this is not true.
To not believe should be the DEFAULT on any claim. I do not believe until I see that it is true.
Now, what have you "seen"? What evidence has made this claim feel so comfortable for you to make?
Not a single person or organization in your life has ever provided you with ANY FACTUAL EVIDENCE proving the existence of a non film "moon landing". You've never seen ANY. You've just seen films, felt emotions, and been fed lies, like the rest of us.
I'm saying it didn't happen and that NO EVIDENCE has been provided that we should use use to change that viewpoint. That is a FULL claim and nothing else is needed to make that claim. The normie relationship with the "moon landings" is all feeling/emotions/patriotic urges. These feelings are INTERPRETED by ourselves as justification for believing the lie. Then, after we have internalized the lie we are able to feel good about ourselves and feel superior to the people who are not smart enough to see reality.
If this isn't what you are experiencing then please let me know.
I say you have no evidence that the "moon landings" were anything besides a film project. I say you interpret your emotions and feelings as evidence that the exceptional claims are true and then misinterpret technical jargon as evidence of the exceptional.
Your EGO was burned so you attacked mine in response.
Now explain why YOU attacked mine is YOUR ego wasn't initially burned by my words, which were not even directed at you.
I'm not intending to attack your EGO. I'm attempting to truthfully identify our motivations for believing, acting and speaking as we do.
I also have an EGO and respond very similarly to your mentioned response at times. Sometimes I appreciate it being brought to my attention, sometimes I don't.
But, the natural response when we feel attacked is to attack back. It's totally natural. I still do it all the time, unfortunately.
Just because Im "calling out" behavior does't mean I am also claiming to be free of the same behaviors.
(post is archived)