I gave you my motivations, which are not based on ego. My motivations are that my own analyses are well aligned with sciences and engineering disciplines that were well established long before the moon landings. How you equate that to being driven by my ego is on you. Knowledge doesn't require emotional, egotistical invocations. Knowledge and fact are impartial and that's what I strive to include in my analyses. Don't try to (((psychoanalyze))) my motives and behaviors on this.
Not once in your life have you ever been provided a single piece of evidence that the "moon landings" were anything but a film project. You've always just believed it. Then you have gone out to the world and found justifications for your belief. Justifications like fitting in, feeling superior, feeling intelligent.
We ALL did this. You, me. ALL of us.
There is ZERO evidence of a non-film "moon landing". There never has been.
Projection. I don't work the same way you do. I don't need to be given proof. I can find my own proof or at least evidence that leads in the direction of proof.
You do you.
"I don't need to be given proof. I can find my own proof or at least evidence that leads in the direction of proof."
Yes. My sentiments as well.
Best of luck to you, brother.
(post is archived)