Why have you chosen to believe what the people on TV say about the "moon landings"?
What piece of "evidence" have they provided you that you feel is most compelling?
I would submit that they have actually provided you ZERO evidence, but that you have not yet realized that as of yet. You have interpreted pictures on a screen + heightened emotions + technical gibberish spoken by "authority" + the comfort of group delusion as evidence of exceptional claims. Those claims WILL NOT hold up the moment you acknowledge that you have been looking at them with squinted vision with the goal to continue believing the illusion.
When you realize you want to know and accept the truth about the "moon landing" claims (the "moon landing" was a series of films) more than you want to see people like me as assholes and idiots then you will have everything you need to discern the truth.
Best of luck to you, brother.
What makes you think I draw my conclusions from the talking heads on TV? I am a man of thought, science and engineering. I derive my conclusions from my own analytical study of what all went into the process. There would be no reason to go to the extreme minutia of engineering found in things like the Saturn V fuel delivery system or faring design if you were just going to fake it on TV. There would be no reason to develop the technically advanced projection screen technology used by NASA Mission Control if it were not actually used for the purpose for which it was engineered. It was crazy complex for its time and didn't have any practical application outside of Mission Control so why develop it? Yeah, my conclusions are based on a very deep dive into many of the ancillary technologies that made it possible since none of them would have been produced if they weren't for the real deal.
Is it all 100% true though? No. Nothing ever is. We don't have the whole story but the whole thing isn't fake. Some things likely were to prevent fiascos that they didn't want to air on TV or risk national security over, but for the most part those were just gap fillers to make the whole thing more palatable to a generation who was already TV addicted and expecting a show. I'm open to other possibilities on the matter, but they have to be able to explain why so much effort was put into things that aren't necessary for a fake production to happen. Without that, the possibility has a lot less credence in my opinion.
"What makes you think I draw my conclusions from the talking heads on TV? I am a man of thought, science and engineering. I derive my conclusions from my own analytical study of what all went into the process."
This was your EGO response. "I am not like the other people who believe the liars on TV. I am too smart to be fooled by them. I am very smart. I am not stupid. I could not be fooled like others."
Anytime you catch yourself in an ego response it's a good idea to take moment and consider you might be on the wrong side of the issue.
The "Moon Landings" are a series of films that have been pushed as "reality" when the truth is they were always just "reality TV".
"There would be no reason to go to the extreme minutia of engineering found in things like the Saturn V fuel delivery system or faring design if you were just going to fake it on TV. There would be no reason to develop the technically advanced projection screen technology used by NASA Mission Control if it were not actually used for the purpose for which it was engineered. "
Have you considered the idea that even with a fraudulent "moon landing" film, that actual products would have been developed? It might have been a fake image on the TV screens around the country, but it was real money that was sent to the companies that developed various products. The development of additional tech is a feature of the fraud, you are discussing it as if it would be some sort of fraud.
"Is it all 100% true though? No. Nothing ever is. "
It's not even remotely true, brother. Nothing. Total fabrication. A creation built within your mind bulwarked by the steel I-Beams of human psychology. It will fall the moment you decide to stop looking for justifications to keep it aloft.
Best of luck to you, brother, regardless of what claims you choose to believe.
Have you considered the idea that even with a fraudulent "moon landing" film, that actual products would have been developed? It might have been a fake image on the TV screens around the country, but it was real money that was sent to the companies that developed various products. The development of additional tech is a feature of the fraud, you are discussing it as if it would be some sort of fraud.
That is exactly what took place. There are thousands to this day who take pride in what they did (and justifiably so in many cases) but were totally clueless that none of their product would ever actually be used. Some did know and kept their mouths shut, they were smart and they knew some of the crap they came up with and presented was laughable, but hey it paid the bills well. I grew up around these people and met and know many of them, you'd be surprised.
It's not even remotely true, brother. Nothing. Total fabrication. A creation built within your mind bulwarked by the steel I-Beams of human psychology. It will fall the moment you decide to stop looking for justifications to keep it aloft.
Speaking of EGO responses...
"I don't want to be like all the "sheep" so I take the opposite side just to be different, like all the other sheep on the opposite side."
It's all good though. You can live on the same planet as I do and have your own beliefs. I do my research and analysis on what makes the best sense to me. I don't need to make up stories to fill in the gaps in my own knowledge or thought and I don't watch TV or movies anyway. You do you and I will do things the way I do. We're probably both wrong anyway, but we won't know that in this lifetime.
(post is archived)