What makes you think I draw my conclusions from the talking heads on TV? I am a man of thought, science and engineering. I derive my conclusions from my own analytical study of what all went into the process. There would be no reason to go to the extreme minutia of engineering found in things like the Saturn V fuel delivery system or faring design if you were just going to fake it on TV. There would be no reason to develop the technically advanced projection screen technology used by NASA Mission Control if it were not actually used for the purpose for which it was engineered. It was crazy complex for its time and didn't have any practical application outside of Mission Control so why develop it? Yeah, my conclusions are based on a very deep dive into many of the ancillary technologies that made it possible since none of them would have been produced if they weren't for the real deal.
Is it all 100% true though? No. Nothing ever is. We don't have the whole story but the whole thing isn't fake. Some things likely were to prevent fiascos that they didn't want to air on TV or risk national security over, but for the most part those were just gap fillers to make the whole thing more palatable to a generation who was already TV addicted and expecting a show. I'm open to other possibilities on the matter, but they have to be able to explain why so much effort was put into things that aren't necessary for a fake production to happen. Without that, the possibility has a lot less credence in my opinion.
"What makes you think I draw my conclusions from the talking heads on TV? I am a man of thought, science and engineering. I derive my conclusions from my own analytical study of what all went into the process."
This was your EGO response. "I am not like the other people who believe the liars on TV. I am too smart to be fooled by them. I am very smart. I am not stupid. I could not be fooled like others."
Anytime you catch yourself in an ego response it's a good idea to take moment and consider you might be on the wrong side of the issue.
The "Moon Landings" are a series of films that have been pushed as "reality" when the truth is they were always just "reality TV".
"There would be no reason to go to the extreme minutia of engineering found in things like the Saturn V fuel delivery system or faring design if you were just going to fake it on TV. There would be no reason to develop the technically advanced projection screen technology used by NASA Mission Control if it were not actually used for the purpose for which it was engineered. "
Have you considered the idea that even with a fraudulent "moon landing" film, that actual products would have been developed? It might have been a fake image on the TV screens around the country, but it was real money that was sent to the companies that developed various products. The development of additional tech is a feature of the fraud, you are discussing it as if it would be some sort of fraud.
"Is it all 100% true though? No. Nothing ever is. "
It's not even remotely true, brother. Nothing. Total fabrication. A creation built within your mind bulwarked by the steel I-Beams of human psychology. It will fall the moment you decide to stop looking for justifications to keep it aloft.
Best of luck to you, brother, regardless of what claims you choose to believe.
Have you considered the idea that even with a fraudulent "moon landing" film, that actual products would have been developed? It might have been a fake image on the TV screens around the country, but it was real money that was sent to the companies that developed various products. The development of additional tech is a feature of the fraud, you are discussing it as if it would be some sort of fraud.
That is exactly what took place. There are thousands to this day who take pride in what they did (and justifiably so in many cases) but were totally clueless that none of their product would ever actually be used. Some did know and kept their mouths shut, they were smart and they knew some of the crap they came up with and presented was laughable, but hey it paid the bills well. I grew up around these people and met and know many of them, you'd be surprised.
It's not even remotely true, brother. Nothing. Total fabrication. A creation built within your mind bulwarked by the steel I-Beams of human psychology. It will fall the moment you decide to stop looking for justifications to keep it aloft.
Speaking of EGO responses...
"I don't want to be like all the "sheep" so I take the opposite side just to be different, like all the other sheep on the opposite side."
It's all good though. You can live on the same planet as I do and have your own beliefs. I do my research and analysis on what makes the best sense to me. I don't need to make up stories to fill in the gaps in my own knowledge or thought and I don't watch TV or movies anyway. You do you and I will do things the way I do. We're probably both wrong anyway, but we won't know that in this lifetime.
Your EGO was burned so you attacked mine in response. Since you have a belief motivated by EGO therefore it seems you've interpreted my lack of belief as ALSO founded on EGO.
But this is not true.
To not believe should be the DEFAULT on any claim. I do not believe until I see that it is true.
Now, what have you "seen"? What evidence has made this claim feel so comfortable for you to make?
Not a single person or organization in your life has ever provided you with ANY FACTUAL EVIDENCE proving the existence of a non film "moon landing". You've never seen ANY. You've just seen films, felt emotions, and been fed lies, like the rest of us.
I'm saying it didn't happen and that NO EVIDENCE has been provided that we should use use to change that viewpoint. That is a FULL claim and nothing else is needed to make that claim. The normie relationship with the "moon landings" is all feeling/emotions/patriotic urges. These feelings are INTERPRETED by ourselves as justification for believing the lie. Then, after we have internalized the lie we are able to feel good about ourselves and feel superior to the people who are not smart enough to see reality.
If this isn't what you are experiencing then please let me know.
I say you have no evidence that the "moon landings" were anything besides a film project. I say you interpret your emotions and feelings as evidence that the exceptional claims are true and then misinterpret technical jargon as evidence of the exceptional.
(post is archived)