Your EGO was burned so you attacked mine in response. Since you have a belief motivated by EGO therefore it seems you've interpreted my lack of belief as ALSO founded on EGO.
But this is not true.
To not believe should be the DEFAULT on any claim. I do not believe until I see that it is true.
Now, what have you "seen"? What evidence has made this claim feel so comfortable for you to make?
Not a single person or organization in your life has ever provided you with ANY FACTUAL EVIDENCE proving the existence of a non film "moon landing". You've never seen ANY. You've just seen films, felt emotions, and been fed lies, like the rest of us.
I'm saying it didn't happen and that NO EVIDENCE has been provided that we should use use to change that viewpoint. That is a FULL claim and nothing else is needed to make that claim. The normie relationship with the "moon landings" is all feeling/emotions/patriotic urges. These feelings are INTERPRETED by ourselves as justification for believing the lie. Then, after we have internalized the lie we are able to feel good about ourselves and feel superior to the people who are not smart enough to see reality.
If this isn't what you are experiencing then please let me know.
I say you have no evidence that the "moon landings" were anything besides a film project. I say you interpret your emotions and feelings as evidence that the exceptional claims are true and then misinterpret technical jargon as evidence of the exceptional.
Your EGO was burned so you attacked mine in response.
Now explain why YOU attacked mine is YOUR ego wasn't initially burned by my words, which were not even directed at you.
I'm not intending to attack your EGO. I'm attempting to truthfully identify our motivations for believing, acting and speaking as we do.
I also have an EGO and respond very similarly to your mentioned response at times. Sometimes I appreciate it being brought to my attention, sometimes I don't.
But, the natural response when we feel attacked is to attack back. It's totally natural. I still do it all the time, unfortunately.
Just because Im "calling out" behavior does't mean I am also claiming to be free of the same behaviors.
I gave you my motivations, which are not based on ego. My motivations are that my own analyses are well aligned with sciences and engineering disciplines that were well established long before the moon landings. How you equate that to being driven by my ego is on you. Knowledge doesn't require emotional, egotistical invocations. Knowledge and fact are impartial and that's what I strive to include in my analyses. Don't try to (((psychoanalyze))) my motives and behaviors on this.
(post is archived)